Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346574›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025

Time to administer polymyxin B hemoperfusion and hemodynamics in patients with septic shock requiring high-dose norepinephrine: a predetermined analysis of a prospective cohort study.

Kyohei Miyamoto, Yu Kawazoe, Noriko Miyagawa, Hitoshi Yamamura, Yoshinori Ohta, Takuya Kimura, Yukitoshi Toyoda, Michihito Kyo, Tetsuya Sato, Masashi Kinjo and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Kyohei MiyamotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan. gomadofu@wakayama-med.ac.jp.
Yu KawazoeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Noriko MiyagawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Hitoshi YamamuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka Minato Central Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshinori OhtaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuya KimuraDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Yukitoshi ToyodaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Michihito KyoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tetsuya SatoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Masashi KinjoDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan.
Masaki TakahashiDivision of Acute and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Junichi MaruyamaDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroshi MatsuuraOsaka Prefectural Nakakawachi Emergency and Critical Care Center, Osaka, Japan.
Kazunori FukushimaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Satoru MurataDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Tomoya OkazakiEmergency Medical Center, Kagawa University Hospital, Kida, Japan.
Tsuyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Toshihiro SakuraiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Gaku TakahashiDepartment of Critical Care and Disaster Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Shiwa, Japan.
Tasuku HanajimaTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Takeshi MorimotoDepartment of Data Science, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed administration of polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) for septic shock could diminish its efficacy in real-world clinical settings.

methodsBEAT-SHOCK (BEst Available Treatment for septic SHOCK) registry is a prospective registry consisting of 309 adult patients with septic shock requiring high-dose norepinephrine (≥ 0.2 μg/kg/min). This predetermined analysis included 82 patients treated with PMX-HP. They were grouped according to the median time from intensive care unit (ICU) admission to administration of PMX-HP: the early administration group (n = 40) and the late administration group (n = 42). The primary outcome was short-term hemodynamic status, including mean arterial pressure and vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS; calculated from doses of dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, milrinone, and levosimendan) within 48 h after ICU admission.

resultsThe median time from ICU admission to administration of PMX-HP was 265 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 113-480). The median ages were 70 (IQR: 59-81) and 72 (IQR: 64-80) years (P = 0.77), and 21/40 (53%) and 25/42 (60%) patients were male (P = 0.52) in the early and late administration groups, respectively. The dose of norepinephrine at ICU admission was 0.33 (IQR: 0.24-0.47) and 0.30 (IQR: 0.22-0.34) μg/kg/min in the early and late administration groups, respectively (P = 0.17). Within 48 h after ICU admission, mean arterial pressure was significantly higher at 6 h and 8 h, and VIS was significantly lower at 8 h and thereafter in the early administration group. Within a 28-day period, there were 23 (IQR: 21-25) and 21 (IQR: 0-24) vasopressor/inotrope-free days (P = 0.027), and 18 (IQR: 1-23) and 14 (IQR: 0-19) ICU-free days (P = 0.025) in the early and late administration groups, respectively. The cumulative mortality at 90 days was 15.3% in the early administration group and 31.3% in the late administration group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.13-1.09).

conclusionsIn patients with septic shock, early administration of PMX-HP was associated with higher mean arterial pressure and lower VIS within 48 h after ICU admission. Additionally, it may be associated with an improved clinical course, represented by more ICU-free and vasopressor/inotrope-free days. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trial Registry on 1 November 2019 (registration no. UMIN000038302).

Indexed as

HemodynamicsHemoperfusionNorepinephrinePolymyxin BShock, SepticAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesAnti-Bacterial AgentsNorepinephrinePolymyxin BVasoconstrictor AgentsBlood purificationPolymyxin B hemoperfusionSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID40346574
PMCPMC12063383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.