Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346564›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2025

Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis.

Natasha Bradley, Tracey McConnell, Carolyn Blair, Peter O'Halloran, Gillian Prue, Fiona Lynn, Nia Roberts, Geoff Wong, Elspeth Banks, Joanne Reid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natasha BradleySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Tracey McConnellSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Carolyn BlairSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Peter O'HalloranSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Gillian PrueSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Fiona LynnSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Nia RobertsBodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Elspeth BanksLiving With and Beyond Cancer, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK.
Joanne ReidSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. j.reid@qub.ac.uk.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR152115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting evidence demonstrates the benefits of integrated palliative care for people with cancer, for improved symptom burden, quality of life for patient and caregiver, and appropriate healthcare resource use. The integration of palliative care and oncology has the potential to reduce suffering and is recommended by international guidelines. However, it is not yet consistent practice. There are many approaches to integration, but it is unclear what works, for whom, and in what contexts, to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients, families, and healthcare systems.

methodsRealist review, conducted in accordance with RAMESES quality standards. Evidence was identified through systematic academic databases searches and stakeholder engagement. Data were extracted from included articles and synthesized using realist analysis to develop explanations of how and why integrated palliative care in oncology works, for whom, and in what contexts.

resultsOne hundred sixty-four papers were included in the review, from 33 countries, and involving a range of inpatient, outpatient, and home-based care settings. Integrated palliative care and oncology could improve patient outcomes, increase the goal-concordance of patient care, and support workforce wellbeing. Interventions towards integration should be tailored to the context in which they are delivered. Ensuring the timely delivery of palliative care for people with cancer requires integration that overcomes siloes between oncology, specialist palliative care, and primary and community care. The motivation to prioritise the integration of palliative care relies upon all stakeholders first understanding its value. Enriched interdisciplinary collaboration involves developing staff skills and confidence, facilitating coordination between care settings, and supporting communication within and between teams. Leadership is needed at all levels to attend to the structural and social norms of care.

conclusionsThe success of integration is influenced by the ways in which palliative care is understood, prioritised, operationalised, and measured within oncology. Through the synthesis of international evidence, this project draws on implementation science to contribute clarity on how integrated palliative care and cancer care can be achieved in practice.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPalliative CareHumansQuality of LifeIntegrationOncologyPalliative careRealist synthesis

Identifiers

PMID40346564
PMCPMC12065255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.