Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346535›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Understanding food choices and promoting healthier food options among online food delivery service users in Australia: a qualitative study.

Adyya Gupta, Kathryn Backholer, Catherine E Huggins, Rebecca Bennett, Gloria K W Leung, Anna Peeters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rethinking public health in the digital food era.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adyya GuptaDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. adyya.gupta@deakin.edu.au.
Kathryn BackholerDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Catherine E HugginsDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Rebecca BennettDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Gloria K W LeungDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Anna PeetersDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 106716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline food delivery services (OFDS) are increasingly used to acquire food prepared out-of-home. Evidence suggests that OFDS commonly promote energy dense and nutrient poor foods, and their regular use may contribute to adverse health outcomes. To inform public health efforts to promote healthy choices on OFDS in Australia, we aimed to explore factors influencing adults' food choices on OFDS and gauge their perceptions towards actions that could support healthier food choices on OFDS.

methodsThis is a qualitative study. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with English speaking adults living in Victoria, Australia, aged 18 to 45 years who reported using OFDS at least once a month. The interview guide was developed to elicit information on factors that prompted participants' food choices on OFDS and gather insights on if and how they could be supported to make healthier food choices on OFDS. Transcripts were deductively coded, guided by the socio-ecological model, using thematic analysis.

resultsThirty Australian adults participated in the study. Participants were mostly women (80%) with a mean age of 28 years and living in metropolitan Melbourne. 85% had completed higher education, 20% lived with children < 18 years of age and > 80% used OFDS 2-5 times per week. A range of individual factors (motivation to seek comfort food, time and cost considerations), social factor (family influence) and environmental level factors related to navigating OFDS (limited availability and accessibility to healthy food outlets and healthy food options; price promotions, low delivery fee and appealing food images) influenced consumers food choice decisions on OFDS. All participants expressed positive attitudes towards potential actions to help them make healthier food choice decisions on OFDS (such as making healthier foods as default or on promotions).

conclusionIndividual and social circumstances, together with online marketing techniques, drive consumers' food purchasing decisions on OFDS. Actions are needed to enhance the accessibility, availability and desirability (through increased visibility and price promotions) of healthy food options on OFDS to promote healthy food choices.

Indexed as

CommerceFoodFood PreferencesInternetAdultAustraliaFamilyHumansInterviews as TopicMarketingMotivationSocial FactorsHealth policyMeal delivery applicationsOnline food choicesOnline food deliveryPublic healthQualitative interview

Identifiers

PMID40346535
PMCPMC12063267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.