ArticleBMC public health2025
Understanding food choices and promoting healthier food options among online food delivery service users in Australia: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- "I'm afraid to eat a piece of toast": The Lived Experience of Balancing Eating and Health Behaviors in Adults with Chronic Pain.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
- Rethinking public health in the digital food era.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Article
- Meal delivery platform use in adults living in Belgium: a qualitative investigation into motivations for and experiences of ordering online.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Urban Indian young adults' perceptions of a healthy lifestyle and its associated factors: a multi-city qualitative inquiry using thematic analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Access to Food Establishments via Meal Delivery Applications: A Study of University and Non-University Settings in a Brazilian Metropolis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOnline food delivery services (OFDS) are increasingly used to acquire food prepared out-of-home. Evidence suggests that OFDS commonly promote energy dense and nutrient poor foods, and their regular use may contribute to adverse health outcomes. To inform public health efforts to promote healthy choices on OFDS in Australia, we aimed to explore factors influencing adults' food choices on OFDS and gauge their perceptions towards actions that could support healthier food choices on OFDS.
methodsThis is a qualitative study. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with English speaking adults living in Victoria, Australia, aged 18 to 45 years who reported using OFDS at least once a month. The interview guide was developed to elicit information on factors that prompted participants' food choices on OFDS and gather insights on if and how they could be supported to make healthier food choices on OFDS. Transcripts were deductively coded, guided by the socio-ecological model, using thematic analysis.
resultsThirty Australian adults participated in the study. Participants were mostly women (80%) with a mean age of 28 years and living in metropolitan Melbourne. 85% had completed higher education, 20% lived with children < 18 years of age and > 80% used OFDS 2-5 times per week. A range of individual factors (motivation to seek comfort food, time and cost considerations), social factor (family influence) and environmental level factors related to navigating OFDS (limited availability and accessibility to healthy food outlets and healthy food options; price promotions, low delivery fee and appealing food images) influenced consumers food choice decisions on OFDS. All participants expressed positive attitudes towards potential actions to help them make healthier food choice decisions on OFDS (such as making healthier foods as default or on promotions).
conclusionIndividual and social circumstances, together with online marketing techniques, drive consumers' food purchasing decisions on OFDS. Actions are needed to enhance the accessibility, availability and desirability (through increased visibility and price promotions) of healthy food options on OFDS to promote healthy food choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.