ArticleBMC public health2025
Client perspectives and satisfaction with integrating facility and community-based HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening with family planning: a mixed method study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-based interventions for non-communicable diseases in Africa: a scoping review of scope, effectiveness, and implementation factors.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Cervical cancer screening policies and implementation in Uganda - a qualitative study on policymakers', cervical cancer experts' and gynecologists' perspectives.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Cervical Cancer in the Era of HPV: Translating Molecular Mechanisms into Preventive Public Health Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvasive Cervical cancer is a largely preventable disease through screening, but access to cervical cancer screening (CCS) remains a challenge in Malawi. Integration of CCS with family planning (FP) services through Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling may increase screening coverage. We aimed to evaluate women's perceptions, motivations, and satisfaction with integration of HPV self-sampling with family planning in Malawi.
methodsIn this mixed-methods study, we purposively sampled and interviewed 29 women who underwent HPV self-sampling for CCS through one of two different CCS-FP integration models in Malawi. We also completed 766 Client Exit Surveys with CCS patients from both models. Model 1 involved only clinic-based HPV self-sampling, while Model 2 included both clinic-based and community-based HPV self-sampling supported by community health workers. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted using a semi-structured guide, audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English for analysis. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVivo 12.0 software and thematic analysis, and quantitative data were analyzed using statistical software.
resultsWomen screened in both models reported reduced transport costs for screening. Those clinic-based valued the convenience of accessing both CCS and FP services in a single visit while those screened in the community appreciated accessing services within their communities. Many found HPV self-sampling easy to use and ensured privacy, especially in the community model where samples were mainly collected within their homes, rather than public toilets or clinic consultation rooms. Women were motivated to undergo CCS due to the perceived risks of cervical cancer, particularly among those living with HIV, the availability of services within the community, and the experience of gynecological symptoms. IDI women expressed satisfaction with being able to make decisions without consulting their spouses, and none reported experiencing social harm following the disclosure of HPV results. The client exit survey data showed that 92.5% of women in both models were very satisfied with the procedure.
conclusionOur findings highlight that women were satisfied with HPV self-sampling, valuing its convenience, privacy, and cost-effectiveness, which enhanced their willingness to undergo CCS. These findings suggest that integrating CCS self-sampling into FP services could potentially improve CCS uptake in Malawi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.