Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346531›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2025

N-glycosylation of PD-L1 modulates the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockades targeting PD-L1 and PD-1.

Bar Kaufman, Muhammad Abu-Ahmad, Olga Radinsky, Eman Gharra, Tal Manko, Baisali Bhattacharya, Daniela Gologan, Nofar Erlichman, Tsipi Meshel, Yoav Nuta and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bar KaufmanThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
Muhammad Abu-AhmadThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
Olga RadinskyThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
Eman GharraThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
Tal MankoThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
Baisali BhattacharyaThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
Daniela GologanThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
Nofar ErlichmanThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Tsipi MeshelThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Yoav NutaThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Tomer CooksThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
Moshe ElkabetsThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel. moshee@bgu.ac.il.
Adit Ben-BaruchThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel. aditbb@tauex.tau.ac.il.
Angel PorgadorThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel. angel@bgu.ac.il.

Funding

Cooperation Program in Cancer Research of the Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) and Israel's Ministry of Science, Technology and Space (MOST) 0006605Cooperation Program in Cancer Research of the Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) and Israel's Ministry of Science, Technology and Space (MOST) 001192ISF NRF 3127/19Israel Cancer Research Fund 81071411Israel Science Foundation 2484/19Israel Science Foundation 302/21Ministry of Innovation, Science & Technology, Israel 5912Rosetrees Translational Accelerator 2022 2022/5United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation 2021055United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation 2023087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PD-L1/PD-1 pathway is crucial for immune regulation and has become a target in cancer immunotherapy. However, in order to improve patient selection for immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies, better selection criteria are needed. This study explores how the N-glycosylation of PD-L1 affects its interaction with PD-1 and ICB efficacy, focusing on its four N-linked glycosylation sites: N35, N192, N200, and N219.

methodsHuman PD-L1 glycosylation mutants-at each individual site or at all four sites together (Nx4)-were tested for their functional interaction with PD-1 using an artificial immune checkpoint reporter assay (IcAR-PD1). The blocking efficacy of anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 antibodies was evaluated using human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB231 and MCF7), as well as A375 melanoma and A549 lung carcinoma cells expressing the glycosylation mutants. Results were validated through ex vivo activation and cytotoxicity assays using human CD8+ T cells.

resultsThe binding of the PD-L1

conclusionsThe N-glycosylation of PD-L1 at all four sites interferes with the ability of anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 ICBs to block PD-L1 interactions with PD-1; in contrast, glycosylation at the N35 site enhances ICB blocking efficacy. These effects are connected to the ability of sPD-L1 to compete with ICB binding to PD-L1 or PD-1. Thus, assessing PD-L1 glycosylation, beyond expression levels, could improve patient stratification and outcomes.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorGlycosylationHumansMutationProtein BindingB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAnti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibodiesCancer immunotherapyCytotoxicityDegranulation assayGlycosylation mutantsInhibitory immune checkpointsN-glycosylationPD-1PD-L1T-cell activation

Identifiers

PMID40346531
PMCPMC12065222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.