ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted versus endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection in node-positive breast cancer: a retrospective comparative study.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Axillary Lymphadenectomy in Breast Cancer: Evolution, Current Evidence, and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2026Review
- Robotic breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective study of feasibility and patient-reported aesthetic outcomes in 88 patients.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic versus endoscopic breast-conserving surgery: a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and aesthetic outcomes in breast cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic and endoscopic minimally invasive breast surgery: a narrative synthesis on divergent global adoption and emerging trends.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Robot-assisted Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Cutting-edge trends in da Vinci single-port robotic approaches to breast surgery: a narrative review.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Review
- Endoscopic Anatomy of the Breast Fascia System: Peripheral-to-Central Approach.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic surgery is increasingly being adopted for breast cancer treatment. However, robust clinical evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety remains limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the surgical quality and short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (R-ALND) and endoscopic-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (E-ALND) in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Here, we report the short-term outcomes of this trial.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study compared the short-term efficacy and safety of R-ALND and E-ALND in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients who underwent surgery at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2022 and October 2024 were included. Clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed.
resultsA total of 56 patients were included, with 29 undergoing E-ALND and 27 undergoing R-ALND. The R-ALND group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (43.37 ± 12.40 min vs. 60.10 ± 19.37 min, p < 0.001) and lower mean intraoperative blood loss (3.26 ± 2.40 ml vs. 9.24 ± 4.29 ml, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, the R-ALND group exhibited better upper limb function and sensation, as evidenced by significantly lower DASH scores at 1-month (10.87 ± 1.35 vs. 14.64 ± 3.49, p < 0.001) and 3-month (6.68 ± 1.86 vs. 9.24 ± 2.74, p < 0.001) follow-ups. Additionally, the R-ALND group had fewer postoperative complications, including a reduced incidence of sensory disturbances, burning sensations, and numbness in the upper limb.
conclusionCompared with E-ALND, R-ALND significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications, with less impact on upper limb function and sensory outcomes. These findings indicate that R-ALND may provide better clinical benefits for patients requiring axillary lymph node dissection in the management of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.