ArticleClinical proteomics2025
Multiplex quantification of endocrine proteins in volumetric dried blood spots.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCirculating proteins are routinely quantified from liquid biopsies to deduce health and disease. Among these are endocrine protein hormones, which regulate human growth, development, metabolism, and reproduction. Most commonly, these proteins are analyzed in plasma or serum prepared from venous blood draws. Recently, devices for quantitative capillary sampling from a finger prick have emerged, but their utility for clinical testing remains to be explored.
methodsTo study the analytical capabilities of quantitative dried blood spots (qDBS), we quantified the luteinizing hormone subunit beta (LHB), follicle-stimulating hormone subunit beta (FSHB), thyroid-stimulating hormone subunit beta (TSHB), prolactin (PRL), and growth hormone 1 (GH1) by multiplexed immunoassays. We determined the performance of the endocrine hormone assays in paired qDBS and EDTA plasma samples from 100 donors (90% females) aged 4 to 78. Lastly, we compared the protein levels with those from an accredited clinical chemistry laboratory.
resultsThe multiplexed analysis showed precise protein quantifications in qDBS (mean CV = 8.3%), high concordance with plasma levels (r = 0.88 to 0.99), and accuracy being matrix- and protein-dependent (recovery: 80-225%). Using the current protocol and sample dilutions, reported protein concentrations were 1.2 to 7.5 times higher in plasma than in qDBS eluates. Concentrations from multiplexed plasma assays agreed with the clinical data (r = 0.87 to 0.99) and decreased slightly when comparing clinical plasma data with multiplexed qDBS assays (r = 0.76 to 0.98). Significant increases in age-related FSHB and LHB levels were observed in females in all specimens and assays (p < 0.01).
conclusionsThis study shows the suitability of modern qDBS devices for quantifying clinically informative proteins in multiplexed assays and highlights the need for future work on specimen-specific optimization and standards. Volumetric DBS sampling offers new routines for accurate protein quantification for precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.