Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346483›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2025

New technique of end to side two layered and stented duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with omental wrapping during Whipple operation.

Hesham A Elmeligy, Ahmed M Azzam, Yousra Ossama, Mahmoud Rady

Expression of concern Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. It is linked to trial NCT06630910 (New Technique of End to Side Two Layered and Stented Duct to Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy With Omental Wrapping During Whipple Operation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06630910 nacompletednot on this map

New Technique of End to Side Two Layered and Stented Duct to Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy With Omental Wrapping During Whipple Operation

TypeinterventionalSponsorTheodor Bilharz Research InstituteRan2022 to 2024Enrolled48ConditionsPeriampullary Carcinoma Resectable, Pancreatic Tumors, Duodenal NeoplasmsArmsPancreaticojejunostomy without stenting and omental patch, Pancreaticojejunostomy with stenting and omental patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hesham A ElmeligyGeneral Surgery Department, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Giza, Egypt. h.elmeligy@tbri.gov.eg.
Ahmed M AzzamEnvironmental Research Department, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Giza, Egypt.
Yousra OssamaPathology Department, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.
Mahmoud RadyGeneral Surgery Department, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA leaking pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is typically the cause of major problems following pancreaticoduodenectomy. To stop fistula formation, omental flaps were positioned around the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis.

methodsForty-eight individuals who had pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures performed between March 2022 and March 2024 were examined. Based on the placement of a stent and omental flaps around the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, the patients were split into two groups: group A, consisting of twenty-four patients, did not get omental wrapping and stenting, and group B, consisting of twenty-four patients, received omental wrapping with stent inside the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. To evaluate the efficacy of the omental flap operation in preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications, perioperative data from both groups was examined.

resultsThere were no discernible variations in the clinical traits of the two groups. Group B experienced considerably lower occurrences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (20.8% vs. 4.2%), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (4.2% vs. 0%), biliary fistula (4.2% vs. 0%), and delayed gastric emptying (12.5% vs. 4.2%). Group B had a considerably lower overall morbidity rate (41.7% vs. 8.3%) and shorter hospital stay (15.3 vs. 10.9 days) than to group A.

conclusionFollowing pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stent and omental flaps around the pancreatic anastomosis can lower the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancrectomy bleeding, and delayed gastric emptying. This straightforward and efficient treatment can decrease the overall morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

trial registrationThe trial registration was recorded as ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier No.: NCT06630910 on 10/05/2024. Our study also adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Indexed as

OmentumPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomyStentsSurgical FlapsAdultAgedAnastomotic LeakFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic FistulaPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesOmental flapsPancreaticoduodenectomyPeriampullary neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40346483
PMCPMC12063378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.