ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Exploring machine learning algorithms to predict short birth intervals and identify its determinants among reproductive-age women in East Africa.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting short birth intervals in Bangladesh using stacked machine learning and SHAP explainability: evidence from BDHS 2022.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe occurrence of short birth intervals among reproductive-age women in East Africa is a critical public health issue, contributing to maternal and child health risks. Identifying the key factors that predict short birth intervals can help design targeted interventions to reduce these risks. Hence, this study aimed to predict short birth intervals and identify their determinants using supervised machine learning models.
methodThis study employs machine learning algorithms to predict short birth intervals among reproductive-age women in East Africa, using a dataset from Demographic and Health Surveys. The dataset undergoes preprocessing steps to handle missing values, encode categorical variables, perform feature selection, and integrate data and normalize numerical features. Four machine learning models, including logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and some machine learning models, including logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and naive Bayes, are trained and evaluated to predict short birth intervals. Model performance is assessed using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC used to ensure reliable results.
resultThe machine learning models identified several key factors that significantly predict short birth intervals among reproductive-age women in East Africa. The Random Forest models demonstrated the highest accuracy (79.4%), precision (79.0%), F-score (84.0%), ROC curve (83.8%), and recall (91.0%), with feature importance analysis highlighting maternal age, educational status, parity, use of family planning, and access to healthcare as the most influential predictors. The findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions addressing healthcare access and family planning to reduce the risks associated with short birth intervals in East African countries.
conclusionThe study demonstrates that machine learning models can effectively identify key predictors of short birth intervals among reproductive-age women in East Africa, providing valuable insights for designing targeted public health interventions to improve maternal and child health outcomes in East Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.