Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346479›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2025

Resection and partial liver transplantation from deceased donors with delayed total hepatectomy (RAPID procedure) for hepatocellular carcinoma: a national, multicenter, non-randomized, prospective trial.

Andrea Peloso, Daniel Pietrasz, Etienne Daillier, Laurent Cylly, Olivier Scatton, Claire Goumard, Jean-Yves Mabrut, Kayvan Mohkam, Mickael Lesurtel, Safi Dokmak and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05971628 (Resection And Partial LIver Transplantation With Delayed Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05971628 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Resection And Partial LIver Transplantation With Delayed Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2023 to 2029Enrolled50ConditionsHepatocellular CarcinomaArmsRAPID procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Andrea PelosoHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.
Daniel PietraszHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.
Etienne DaillierClinical Research Unit, Paris Saclay University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Laurent CyllyClinical Research Unit, Paris Saclay University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Olivier ScattonDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Sorbonne University, INSERM UMRS-938, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Claire GoumardDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Sorbonne University, INSERM UMRS-938, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Jean-Yves MabrutDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France.
Kayvan MohkamDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France.
Mickael LesurtelDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Paris, France.
Safi DokmakDepartment of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Paris, France.
Heithem JeddouDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Karim BoudjemaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Marc-Antoine AllardHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.
René AdamHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.
Antonio Sa CunhaHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.
Daniel AzoulayHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.
Daniel CherquiHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.
Eric VibertHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.
Nicolas GolseHepato-Biliary Center, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France. nicolas.golse@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis trial wants to ascertain whether the RAPID procedure could improve graft availability and patient survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) setting. RAPID-HCC trial, which aims to decrease waiting times and mortality for patients on the transplant list by adopting a novel surgical approach, could be a major step forward in liver transplantation (LT). If successful, the RAPID procedure could become a new standard of care for LT, addressing the critical shortage of organs and improving outcomes for selected patients with early-stage HCC. We expected to provide critical evidence to support the wider adoption of this new approach.

methodsThe RAPID-HCC trial is a prospective, multicentre study conducted across five major university hospitals in France aiming to assess the feasibility, safety, tolerance, and efficacy of the RAPID procedure on HCC patients. A total of 50 adult HCC patients with preserved liver function (MELD score ≤ 15) will be enrolled and 34 of these will receive a split liver graft from a brain-dead donor (DBD). The RAPID procedure consists in splitting a deceased donor liver and transplanting it into two adult recipients. The operation consists of two phases: first, the donor's left lateral lobe (G23) replaces the recipient's left liver lobe (H1234), while the native right lobe stays to support hepatic function. The recipient's right lobe (H5678) is removed four months later, leaving the graft fully functional. Primary outcomes will focus on the feasibility and safety of the procedure, assessed by successful completion of both surgical stages and monitoring for adverse events. Secondary outcomes will include graft and patient survival, incidence of rejection and HCC recurrence, waiting times and overall patient outcomes compared to conventional whole liver transplantation. DISCUSSION: Early insights from several studies hint that the RAPID method might improve graft availability and recipient survival. Still, further studies are needed to confirm these benefits, especially for HCC patients. RAPID HCC trial pushes forward liver transplants for HCC patients who still have good liver function. This method could reduce waiting times and mortality in transplant candidates. If successful, the RAPID procedure could be adopted as a new standard for LT. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A} {2B}: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05971628. Registered on August 2, 2023, before the start of inclusion. Project Code: APHP210351 / N° IDRCB: 2022-A02151-42. GRANT SUPPORT: This study was supported by the French national PHRC-K Inca 2020.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationAdultFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesTissue DonorsTreatment OutcomeAuxiliary liver transplantationDelayed hepatectomyGraft splitHCCPartial liver transplantationTwo stages hepatectomy

Identifiers

PMID40346479
PMCPMC12063376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.