ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Unraveling the complex genetic landscape of OTOF-related hearing loss: a deep dive into cryptic variants and haplotype phasing.
Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPathogenic variants in OTOF are a major cause of auditory synaptopathy. However, challenges remain in interpreting OTOF variants, including difficulties in confirming haplotype phasing using traditional short-read sequencing (SRS) due to the large gene size, the potential incomplete penetrance of certain variants, and difficulties in assessing variants at non-canonical splice sites. This study aims to revisit the genetic landscape of OTOF variants in a Taiwanese non-syndromic auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) cohort using a combination of sequencing technologies, predictive tools, and experimental validations.
methodsWe performed SRS to analyze OTOF variants in 65 unrelated Taiwanese patients diagnosed with non-syndromic ANSD, complemented by long-read sequencing (LRS) for haplotype phasing. A prediction-to-validation pipeline was implemented to assess the pathogenicity of cryptic variants using SpliceAI software and minigene assays.
resultsBiallelic pathogenic OTOF variants were identified in 33 patients (50.8%), while monoallelic variants were found in five patients. Three novel variants, c.3864G > A (p.Ala1288 =), c.4501G > A (p.Ala1501Thr), and c.5813 + 2T > C, were detected. The pathogenicity of two non-canonical mis-splicing variants, c.3894 + 5G > C and c.3864G > A (p.Ala1288 =), was confirmed by minigene assays. LRS-based haplotype phasing revealed that the common missense variant c.5098G > C (p.Glu1700Gln) and the novel variant c.5975A > G (p.Lys1992Arg) are in cis and form a founder pathogenic allele in the Taiwanese population.
conclusionsOur study highlights the genetic heterogeneity of DFNB9 and emphasizes the importance of population-specific variant interpretation. The integration of advanced sequencing technologies, predictive algorithms, and functional validation assays will improve the accuracy of molecular diagnosis and inform personalized treatment strategies for individuals with DFNB9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.