ArticleBMC primary care2025
Exploring the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards primary healthcare in northwest Syria.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThough primary healthcare (PHC) is an essential component of a robust health system, it remains under-developed and under-resourced in many fragile and conflict affected settings. In Syria, even pre-conflict, the health system had more emphasis on specialist and secondary care with weaker emphasis on PHC. This is beginning to change with investment from donors, international and humanitarian organisations; however, its implementation remains challenging, in part due to negative attitudes towards PHC among both physicians and patients. Our aim is to explore attitudes towards PHC in northwest Syria among relevant stakeholders.
methodsA qualitative research design using a contextualist approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders who had experience of the Syrian health system before and after the conflict. Purposive and subsequent snowball sampling were used for recruitment. A topic guide was developed with stakeholders and interviews were conducted using Microsoft Teams. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and translated where appropriate. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted using Nvivo V.12 software.
resultsFifteen in-depth interviews were conducted; 7 were female. The main emerging themes and subthemes were: 1. Governance of the health system (subthemes: inadequate communication and coordination; the power of donors; lack of monitoring systems; inadequate health information systems). 2. The observed attitudes of community and patients' towards primary healthcare (sub-themes: perceived patients' attitudes towards PHC; importance of building trust with the community; impact of cost on service use). 3. Healthcare workforce and primary healthcare (sub-themes: negative attitudes towards PHC as a specialty; numbers and capabilities of healthcare professionals; changing attitudes towards PHC as a system). DISCUSSION: Though there was some evidence that attitudes were changing, there remain prevailing negative attitudes towards PHC, including a reluctance among undergraduates to choose it as a destination specialty. Without further understanding barriers, efforts by donors and humanitarian organisations to implement effective PHC in northwest Syria may flounder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.