ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2025
ASO Practice Guidelines Series: Multidisciplinary Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent a rare and biologically diverse group of malignancies, distinct from soft tissue sarcomas arising in other anatomic regions. Their deep-seated location, large size at presentation and proximity to critical structures contribute to diagnostic delays, treatment challenges, and variable oncologic outcomes, particularly when managed outside high-volume referral centers. Current international guidelines emphasize the importance of preoperative biopsy, review by a sarcoma pathologist, management in a referral center, multidisciplinary case discussion, consideration for clinical trials enrollment, and prospective database inclusion as standards of care. Given that the quality of the initial surgical resection-achieving complete macroscopic resection with margins tailored to the histologic type-remains the most important modifiable prognostic factor, adherence to international best practices in surgical and multimodal treatment is crucial to optimize patient outcomes. This article reviews contemporary management strategies for adult-type RPS, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40346412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.