ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Evaluating the polypharmacological potency of indenopyrazole against lung cancer oxidoreductase, chaperone, transferase, and hydrolase proteins.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer, the deadliest malignancy worldwide, causes 2.2 million cases and 1.8 million deaths annually, accounting for 18% of cancer deaths. Limited early detection, unaffordable treatments, and drug resistance lead to low survival rates, highlighting the urgent need for developing effective, resistance-proof therapies. In this study, we docked the DrugBank library against Lung Cancer Oxidoreductase, Chaperone, Transferase, and Hydrolase Proteins to identify a multitargeted drug candidate, resulting in identifying a promising drug candidate named Indenopyrazole with docking and MM\GBSA scores ranging from -7.337 to -11.62 and -17.82 to -60.38 kcal/mol, respectively. We also evaluated the interaction pattern of the drug candidate with Molecular Interaction Fingerprints and found that the most interacting residues with its counts are 4TRP, 3ASP, 3GLN, 3GLU, 3LYS, 3PHE, and 3TYR. The pharmacokinetics and comparison with standard values supported the candidate, followed by the density functional theory computations. The study was also validated for the WaterMap for water thermodynamics, and its role in binding pockets has also supported the idea that Indenopyrazole has a multitargeted potency. Further, we extended our studies with 100ns MD Simulation in water to analyse the deviations, fluctuations, and intermolecular interactions, and all the 1000 trajectories were evaluated for total complex energy and binding free energy with MM\GBSA concluding wonderful promising results in support of Indenopyrazole as a multitargeted drug candidate-however, its efficacy needs to be experimentally validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40346388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.