ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
The estimation of biological sex through the radius and ulna in Portuguese reference skeletal samples.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New method of sex estimation through osteometric analysis of the lower limb for the Portuguese population.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex estimation is a critical step in the identification process of human skeletal remains, alongside age, stature and population affinities. The pelvis is the most dimorphic skeletal region but the long bones also provide good estimates of sex. This study aims to develop models for sex estimation using the ulna and radius in a pooled sample of 181 individuals (107 females, 74 males) from the Coimbra Identified Skeletal Collection and the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection. A metric approach was implemented for sex estimation based on these measurements, resulting in fifteen models generated through logistic regression that were subsequently tested in the Lisbon Identified Skeletal Collection (N = 107; 61 females, 55 males). The resulting models were contrived in an online responsive application ( https://vertigemdasespecies.shinyapps.io/RADIULNA/ ) designed to facilitate sex predictions. In general, the models present high accuracy and low sex-bias. Overall accuracies vary between 84.0% and 95.8% under cross-validation, and between 81.9% and 90.6% in the testing sample. Among the radius-only models, the 3R model (variables sagittal diameter of the head, head-tuberosity radial length and distal epiphysis width) presents the higher accuracy under cross-validation (94.7%), while the 4R model (same variables as 3R plus the circumference of the radial tuberosity) shows the best performance in the testing sample (90.6%). In the ulna, the model with higher cross-validated accuracy is the 4U model (variables maximum length, ulnar coronoid height and circumference at the midshaft), while the 2U model (variables maximum length and ulnar notch length) performs better in the testing set (89.8%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40346373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.