Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346353›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025

Static Precision of Instrumented Pointers for Anatomical Landmark Calibration in CAST-Like Motion Analysis Measurements.

Kristóf Rácz, Beáta Seregély, Rita M Kiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristóf RáczDepartment of Mechatronics, Optics and Mechanical Engineering Informatics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111, Budapest, Hungary.
Beáta SeregélyDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Vas utca 17., H-1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Rita M KissDepartment of Mechatronics, Optics and Mechanical Engineering Informatics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111, Budapest, Hungary. rita.kiss@mogi.bme.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3607-8435

Funding

Hungarian Scientific Research Fund K135042Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap Project no. TKP-9-8/PALY-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Calibrated Anatomical Systems Technique is an integral part of modern motion analysis systems. However, the calibration of anatomical landmarks is shown to have large variations in intra- and inter-examiner accuracy, which can result in both offset type errors or changes in the characteristics of joint angles and other parameters. This paper is the first instalment in a series of articles aiming to characterize and minimize all of the different factors contributing to these inconsistent calibrations by examining and optimizing the performance of the instrumented pointers used for landmark calibration. A complete characterisation of all aspects of instrumented pointer precision has not been done before.

methodsThis paper focuses on examining four different pointers used with an optical OptiTrack motion capture system to establish the expected variability when measuring pointer tip location. Four different pointers were measured at three different locations within the motion capture system's measurement volume, in a distinct orientation at each of these location.

resultsA single stationary marker can be measured with less than 0.06 mm variation with 95% confidence, whilst the variation of the tip of a stationary pointer is 0.2 mm. If the pointer markers are located closer than what the motion capture system is able to resolve, these variations can more than double, but pointer geometry has limited effect on precision apart from this.

conclusionThanks to improvement of motion capture technology in the last 20 years, static precision is already excellent. Robustness of tracking can likely be improved, but it's effect on overall pointer precision would be minimal and likely inconsequential.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksCalibrationHumansMovementAnatomical landmarkCalibrated anatomical systems techniqueInstrumented pointerMotion analysisPrecision

Identifiers

PMID40346353
PMCPMC12283851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.