ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Impact of Residual Intimal Flap Displacement Post-TEVAR on TBAD Haemodynamics in Compliant, Patient-specific CFD Simulations Informed by MRI.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visualization analysis of research hotspots and trends in Type B Aortic Dissection based on bibliometrics.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Utility of Computational Modeling in Reassessing the Threshold for Intervention and Progression into Type A Aortic Dissection.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a novel formulation of a moving boundary method to account for the motion of the intimal flap (IF) in a TBAD post-thoracic endovascular aortic repair using patient-specific compliant computational fluid dynamics simulations. The simulations were informed by non-invasive 4D flow MRI sequences. Predicted flow waveforms, aortic wall, and IF displacements were validated against in vivo 4D flow MRI and cine-MRI data. The patient-specific simulation showed that at peak systole, the dynamic interplay between high IF displacement and high transmural pressures promoted true lumen compression and false lumen expansion, whilst luminal patterns were reversed at the deceleration phase. High vorticity and swirling flow patterns were observed throughout the cardiac cycle at the primary entry tear, the descending aorta and proximal to the visceral aortic branches, correlating with high relative residence time, which could indicate an increased localised risk of aortic growth proximal to the IF. A rigid IF simulation revealed significant discrepancies in haemodynamic metrics, highlighting the potential mispredictions when using a rigid wall assumption to assess disease progression. Simulations assuming a more compliant IF highlighted potential increased risks of visceral branches malperfusion and localised aortic wall degeneration. The study underscores the necessity of patient-specific compliant IF simulations for accurate TBAD haemodynamic assessments. These insights can improve disease understanding and inform future treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.