SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Should We Do Postoperative Radiotherapy After Keloid Excision as Soon as Possible? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Surgical Excision with Adjuvant Therapies in the Management of Keloids: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of peri-operative high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in keloids: Can we scare the bad scar?Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Article
- Post-surgical electron beam radiotherapy for prevention of keloid recurrence: A retrospective study of 619 cases demonstrating low recurrence (6.5%) with optimised 18 Gy in two fractions.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Assessment of keloids recurrence rate in patients treated by brachytherapy versus electron beam radiotherapy versus surgical excision.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Deciphering the cellular landscape of pathological scars.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- Wound Infection After Keloid Excision and Adjuvant Radiotherapy: Two Case Reports and Literature Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no consensus on the timing of postoperative radiotherapy for keloid.
objectiveWe conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the appropriate time of radiotherapy for keloid in the first 24 hours after operation and identify the potential risk factors. MATERIALS AND
methodA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on observational studies by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The pooled estimate of the keloid recurrence rate was calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on time, overtime, BED, length, and location of keloid.
resultsEight observational studies with 507 keloids met the inclusion criteria, and 7 studies were finally included in this study after sensitivity analysis. The recurrence rate was lower in the 2 hours postoperative radiotherapy group (7% CI 2-14%) than in the 6 hours postoperative radiotherapy group (16%, CI 3-36%) (P<0.01). In HDR subgroup analysis, the 2 hours group was better than the 6 hours group ((5%, CI 1-14%) versus (16%, CI 3-36.1%) (P<0.01). Subgroup analysis based on BED indicated that the BED 30 group (5%, CI 1-14%) had a lower recurrence rate than the BED 20 group (6%, CI 0-21%) and the BED 15 group (26%, CI 19-33%) (P<0.01). The keloid length >5 cm subgroup (10.4%, CI 0.4-29%) showed a higher recurrence rate than the keloid length <5 cm group (9.9%, CI 0-41%) (P=0.011).
conclusionImmediate postoperative radiotherapy within 2 hours significantly decreased recurrence rate than postoperative radiotherapy within 6 hours. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40346340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.