ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Scoping review of deep learning research illuminates artificial intelligence chasm in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turing problems in otolaryngology: a scoping review of the principal challenges of artificial ıntelligence and large language models.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Mapping the role of artificial intelligence in health-related stigma: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning in Otolaryngology: A Narrative Review.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Model for Imaging-Based Extranodal Extension Detection and Outcome Prediction in Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2026Article
- Virtual medicine: medical AI in human health and diseases.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Article
- The Utilization of Artificial Intelligence by Pediatric Otolaryngology Surgeons in Professional Practice.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical validation studies are important to translate artificial intelligence (AI) technology in healthcare but may be underperformed in Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery (OHNS). This scoping review examined deep learning publications in OHNS between 1996 and 2023. Searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases identified 3236 articles of which 444 met inclusion criteria. Publications increased exponentially from 2012-2022 across 48 countries and were most concentrated in otology and neurotology (28%), most targeted extending health care provider capabilities (56%), and most used image input data (55%) and convolutional neural network models (63%). Strikingly, nearly all studies (99.3%) were in silico, proof of concept early-stage studies. Three (0.7%) studies conducted offline validation and zero (0%) clinical validation, illuminating the "AI chasm" in OHNS. Recommendations to cross this chasm include focusing on low complexity and low risk tasks, adhering to reporting guidelines, and prioritizing clinical translation studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.