ArticleInsights into imaging2025
The interpretable CT-based vision transformer model for preoperative prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma SSIGN score and outcome.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A structured teaching module for postoperative follow-up in urology residency training: development and evaluation of an IMDB-based educational tool.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Multimodal Prediction of Renal Tumor Malignancy From Radiology Reports and Structured Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate an interpretable CT-based vision transformer (ViT) model for preoperative prediction of the stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) and outcome in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients.
methodsEight hundred forty-five ccRCC patients from multiple centers were retrospectively enrolled. For each patient, 768 ViT features were extracted in the cortical medullary phase (CMP) and renal parenchymal phase (RPP) images, respectively. The CMP ViT model (CVM), RPP ViT model (RVM), and CMP-RPP combined ViT model (CRVM) were constructed to predict the SSIGN in ccRCC patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of each model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the net clinical benefit. The endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the association between model-predicted SSIGN and PFS. The SHAP approach was applied to determine the prediction process of the CRVM.
resultsThe CVM, RVM, and CRVM demonstrated good performance in predicting SSIGN, with a high AUC of 0.859, 0.883, and 0.895, respectively, in the test cohort. DCA demonstrated the CRVM performed best in clinical net benefit. In predicting PFS, CRVM achieved a higher Harrell's concordance index (C-index, 0.840) than the CVM (0.719) and RVM (0.773) in the test cohort. The SHAP helped us understand the impact of ViT features on CRVM's SSIGN prediction from a global and individual perspective.
conclusionThe interpretable CT-based CRVM may serve as a non-invasive biomarker in predicting the SSIGN and outcome of ccRCC. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our findings outline the potential of an interpretable CT-based ViT biomarker for predicting the SSIGN score and outcome of ccRCC, which might facilitate patient counseling and assist clinicians in therapy decision-making for individual cases. KEY POINTS: Current first-line imaging lacks preoperative prediction of the SSIGN score for ccRCC patients. The ViT model could predict the SSIGN score and outcome of ccRCC patients. This study can facilitate the development of personalized treatment for ccRCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.