Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346302›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Using machine learning models to predict the impact of template mismatches on polymerase chain reaction assay performance.

Brittany Knight, Taylor Otwell, Michael P Coryell, Jennifer Stone, Phillip Davis, Bryan Necciai, Paul E Carlson, Shanmuga Sozhamannan, Alyxandria M Schubert, Yi H Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reality check: testing theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brittany KnightMRIGlobal, 425 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Kansas City, MO, 64110, USA.
Taylor OtwellMRIGlobal, 425 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Kansas City, MO, 64110, USA.
Michael P CoryellLaboratory of Mucosal Pathogens and Cellular Immunology, Division of Bacterial, Parasitic and Allergenic Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Jennifer StoneMRIGlobal, 425 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Kansas City, MO, 64110, USA.
Phillip DavisMRIGlobal, 425 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Kansas City, MO, 64110, USA.
Bryan NecciaiDefense Biological Product Assurance Office (DBPAO), Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (JPEO-CBRND), Joint Project Lead, Enabling Biotechnologies JPL-EB, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Paul E CarlsonLaboratory of Mucosal Pathogens and Cellular Immunology, Division of Bacterial, Parasitic and Allergenic Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Shanmuga SozhamannanDefense Biological Product Assurance Office (DBPAO), Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (JPEO-CBRND), Joint Project Lead, Enabling Biotechnologies JPL-EB, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Alyxandria M SchubertDivision of Microbiology, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Yi H YanDivision of Microbiology, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA. yi.yan1@fda.hhs.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular assays are critical tools for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. These assays have been extremely valuable during the COVID pandemic, used to guide both patient management and infection control strategies. Sustained transmission and unhindered proliferation of the virus during the pandemic resulted in many variants with unique mutations. Some of these mutations could lead to signature erosion, where tests developed using the genetic sequence of an earlier version of the pathogen may produce false negative results when used to detect novel variants. In this study, we assessed the performance changes of 15 molecular assay designs when challenged with a variety of mutations that fall within the targeted region. Using data generated from this study, we trained and assessed the performance of seven different machine learning models to predict whether a specific set of mutations will result in significant change in the performance for a specific test design. The best performing model demonstrated acceptable performance with sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 87% when assessed using tenfold cross validation. Our findings highlighted the potential of using machine learning models to predict the impact of emerging mutations on the performance of specific molecular test designs.

Indexed as

Base Pair MismatchCOVID-19Machine LearningPolymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2HumansMutationSensitivity and SpecificityFalse negative resultIn silico predictionqPCR performanceSignature erosionSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40346302
PMCPMC12064694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.