ArticleScientific reports2025
Using machine learning models to predict the impact of template mismatches on polymerase chain reaction assay performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- TAPPR PCR assay design-targeted, automated, primer and probe retrieval for scalable molecular assay design.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Reality check: testing theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular assays are critical tools for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. These assays have been extremely valuable during the COVID pandemic, used to guide both patient management and infection control strategies. Sustained transmission and unhindered proliferation of the virus during the pandemic resulted in many variants with unique mutations. Some of these mutations could lead to signature erosion, where tests developed using the genetic sequence of an earlier version of the pathogen may produce false negative results when used to detect novel variants. In this study, we assessed the performance changes of 15 molecular assay designs when challenged with a variety of mutations that fall within the targeted region. Using data generated from this study, we trained and assessed the performance of seven different machine learning models to predict whether a specific set of mutations will result in significant change in the performance for a specific test design. The best performing model demonstrated acceptable performance with sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 87% when assessed using tenfold cross validation. Our findings highlighted the potential of using machine learning models to predict the impact of emerging mutations on the performance of specific molecular test designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.