ArticleNature cancer2025
Atezolizumab plus personalized neoantigen vaccination in urothelial cancer: a phase 1 trial.
Article in Nature cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03359239 (Pilot Study of Atezolizumab Plus PGV001, a Multipeptide Personalized Neoantigen Vaccine, in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metad or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pilot Study of Atezolizumab Plus PGV001, a Multipeptide Personalized Neoantigen Vaccine, in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metad or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bottleneck-first evaluation of antigen delivery platforms for therapeutic cancer vaccines.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- From Universal Aspiration to Precision Immunization: A Hypothesis Framework for Antigen-Defined, HLA-Restricted Cancer Vaccines.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Cancer Vaccines in Genitourinary Malignancies: Current Advances and Future Directions.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Cancer vaccines: comprehensive review.BJS open · 2026Review
- The promises and challenges of neoantigen cancer vaccines.Nature biotechnology · 2026Review
- Neoantigen Targeting as a Novel Approach for Therapy-Resistant Tumors.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Pipe dream to pipeline: Journey of cancer vaccines and the road ahead.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing the immune system: future directions in cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The 2025 paradigm shift in urothelial carcinoma pharmacotherapy: from chemotherapy to ADCs and ICIs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Targeting innate immunity in cancer: mechanistic foundations, therapeutic vaccination, and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Progress in cancer vaccines enabled by nanotechnology.Nature nanotechnology · 2025Review
- mRNA and DNA-Based Vaccines in Genitourinary Cancers: A New Frontier in Personalized Immunotherapy.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Review
- Perioperative treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in the era of immunotherapy.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Features of constrained adaptive immunity and high neoantigen burden have been correlated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In an attempt to stimulate antitumor immunity, we evaluated atezolizumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1) in combination with PGV001, a personalized neoantigen vaccine, in participants with urothelial cancer. The primary endpoints were feasibility (as defined by neoantigen identification, peptide synthesis, vaccine production time and vaccine administration) and safety. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, duration of response and progression-free survival for participants treated in the metastatic setting, time to progression for participants treated in the adjuvant setting, overall survival and vaccine-induced neoantigen-specific T cell immunity. A vaccine was successfully prepared (median 20.3 weeks) for 10 of 12 enrolled participants. All participants initiating treatment completed the priming cycle. The most common treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 injection site reactions, fatigue and fever. At a median follow-up of 39 months, three of four participants treated in the adjuvant setting were free of recurrence and two of five participants treated in the metastatic setting with measurable disease achieved an objective response. All participants demonstrated on-treatment emergence of neoantigen-specific T cell responses. Neoantigen vaccination plus ICI was feasible and safe, meeting its endpoints, and warrants further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03359239 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40346292What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.