Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Synovial fluid viscosity with synovial fluid cell count, valuable diagnostic marker of prosthetic joint infections.

Samo Roškar, René Mihalič, Anže Mihelič, Rihard Trebše

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samo RoškarValdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Jadranska Cesta 31, 6280, Ankaran, Slovenia.
René MihaličValdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Jadranska Cesta 31, 6280, Ankaran, Slovenia.
Anže MiheličValdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Jadranska Cesta 31, 6280, Ankaran, Slovenia.
Rihard TrebšeValdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Jadranska Cesta 31, 6280, Ankaran, Slovenia. rihard.trebse@ob-valdoltra.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1075-3351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of standard criteria for prosthetic joint infections (PJI), several diagnostic modalities have been proposed mostly concentrating on novel biochemical markers. The physical chemistry markers received scarce attention. Synovial fluid (SF) viscosity could be considered as marker for PJI, however, its diagnostic value of PJI remains unknown. Our study aimed to determine the potential of SF viscosity as a diagnostic marker of PJI and compare it to SF cell count with differential (CCD). We prospectively analysed 123 SF samples (58 septic and 65 aseptic) for viscosity and CCD of SF obtained during hip and knee revision procedures. The diagnosis of PJI based on EBJIS criteria. The viscosity cut-off for PJI was calculated and the diagnostic power was compared to CCD. The mean SF viscosity in the PJI group was 8.5 ± 0.4 mPa s and 103.2 ± 18.8 mPa s in the aseptic group (p < 0.05). SF viscosity achieved 100% sensitivity and 85.3% specificity, with AUC 0.832 (95% CI 0.739, 0.925). Combination of SF viscosity and CCD achieved AUC 0.951 (95% CI 0.919, 0.987). SF viscosity is more sensitive but slightly less specific in diagnosing PJI than SF CCD. Best diagnostic value is achieved combining SF viscosity with CCD in detection of PJI.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsSynovial FluidAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCell CountFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesViscosityBiomarkersProsthetic joint infectionsSynovial fluid cell countSynovial fluid viscosityTotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40346265
PMCPMC12064731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.