ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatio-temporal variations in carbon sources, sinks and footprints of cropland ecosystems in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain of China, 2013-2022.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Phenological Features with Time Series Transformer for Accurate Rice Field Mapping in Fragmented and Cloud-Prone Areas.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cropland ecosystems, which are most affected by human activities, are dual carriers of carbon sources and sinks. It has significant implications for the achievement of the "two-carbon" objective. The Middle and Lower Yangtze River Plain (MLYRP) is the principal grain-producing area of China, which is a great agricultural country. The development of green agriculture in this plain is of vital importance. Nevertheless, there is a lack of attention to the dynamics of the carbon footprints of cropland. Hence, this study was conducted with the help of carbon emission coefficient method. It investigated the spatio-temporal variations of carbon sources, sinks and carbon footprints of cropland ecosystems in this plain from 2013 to 2022. The findings suggest that (1) Carbon uptake was fluctuating up during the study period. Carbon uptake was higher in paddy and wheat. (2) Carbon emissions were declining year by year. Fertilizer and irrigated agriculture produced more carbon emissions. The top four for both indicators were Anhui, Jiangsu, Hubei and Hunan provinces. (3) The carbon footprint declined in fluctuations. This indicator ranked the top four in Hubei, Anhui, Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces. The spatial distribution pattern of the above three indicators was more in the north and less in the south. (4) Cropland ecosystems exhibited carbon sinks. There were relatively large carbon eco-surplus and high carbon eco-efficiency. Nevertheless, the carbon ecological surplus was decreasing in fluctuation. Consequently, MLYRP should keep popularizing new technologies such as green manure crops and precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.