ArticleScientific reports2025
Disposable e-cigarettes and their nicotine delivery, usage pattern, and subjective effects in occasionally smoking adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a school program for vaping and smoking prevention and protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial in fifth grade students.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Restructuring areas, reshaping norms: Denormalizing (e-)cigarette use in Swiss vocational and high schools.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026Article
- Sweeteners in E-Cigarettes: A Minireview of Flavoring and Biological Action.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Electronic Cigarette Use (Vaping) Among Adolescents: A Narrative Review of an Emerging Public Health Epidemic.Cureus · 2025Review
- Influence of Different Nicotine Sources on Exercise-Driven Immune Responses of Peripheral Blood Monocytes.Toxics · 2025Article
- Vaping ΔExpert review of clinical pharmacologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New disposable e-cigarettes are popular, especially among young people. This study aimed to assess their addictive potential by examining puffing behaviors, subjective effects, and conducting laboratory investigations in an experimental setting. Single-center, four-arm, crossover study. Laboratory setting in Munich (LMU-University Hospital), Germany. Eighteen occasionally cigarette-smoking adults aged 19-28. Two disposable e-cigarettes of the same brand (strawberry-kiwi/ tobacco flavored) were tested with a cigarette and a conventional pod e-cigarette as comparators. Usage was ad libitum for 5 min (or the duration of smoking one cigarette) while puffing topography was recorded. Distributed over 30 min blood samples for nicotine plasma concentrations were drawn and hemodynamic parameters and subjective effects assessed. Nicotine delivery of disposable e-cigarettes (C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.