ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction of disability risk prediction model for the elderly based on machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Classification of Current Functional Impairment in Older Adults with Diabetes: Evidence from CHARLS 2015.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Multidimensional Health Decline Prediction Framework: Data-Driven Modeling for the Middle-Aged and Elderly Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nurses as guardians of time: the hidden clinical value of continuous care in geriatrics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- The Future Dynamics of Long-Term Care Pressure in China's Longevity Era: A Prediction Based on the Discrete-Time Markov Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aimed to develop a predictive model using machine learning algorithms, providing healthcare professionals with a novel tool for assessing disability risk in older adults. Data from the 2018 and 2020 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were utilized, including 3,172 participants aged 65 years and older with no baseline disability. In this study, five machine learning algorithms were employed to construct risk assessment and prediction models for disability in older adults. The Shapley Additive Explanations method was applied to analyze the independent predictors of disability risk. In total, 695 participants (21.9%) were disabled during follow-up. Among the five machine learning models, prediction models constructed using random forest and extreme gradient boosting methods showed superior performance, achieving F1 scores of 0.92 and 0.86 and accuracies of 0.92 and 0.85, respectively. Key predictors of disability risk included self-rated health, education, sleep duration, alcohol consumption, depressive symptoms, hypertension, and arthritis. The Machine learning models for assessing and predicting disability risk in older adults, particularly those developed using RF and XGBoost algorithms, exhibited strong predictive capabilities. These findings highlight the potential of these models for practical application in clinical and public health settings, warranting further exploration and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.