Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346172›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Addressing significant challenges for animal detection in camera trap images: a novel deep learning-based approach.

Margarita Mulero-Pázmány, Sandro Hurtado, Cristóbal Barba-González, María Luisa Antequera-Gómez, Francisco Díaz-Ruiz, Raimundo Real, Ismael Navas-Delgado, José F Aldana-Montes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Monitoring wildlife health for diseases with visible signs by integrating camera traps with marked individuals.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond the Classics: The Synergy of AI and Genomics Reveals an Expanded Repertoire of Pigmentation Genes.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Margarita Mulero-Pázmány *Department of Animal Biology, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain. muleromara@uma.es.
Sandro Hurtado *KHAOS Research Group, ITIS Software, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Cristóbal Barba-GonzálezKHAOS Research Group, ITIS Software, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
María Luisa Antequera-GómezKHAOS Research Group, ITIS Software, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Francisco Díaz-RuizDepartment of Animal Biology, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Raimundo RealDepartment of Animal Biology, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Ismael Navas-DelgadoKHAOS Research Group, ITIS Software, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
José F Aldana-MontesKHAOS Research Group, ITIS Software, University of Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain.

Funding

Andalusian Plan for Research, Development, and Innovation (PAIDI 2020) co-financed by the European Union FEDER Andalusia Operational Program 2014-2020 Project PY20-01063ERDF (Spain's Pluri-regional Operative Programme 2014-2020) through the Spanish Ministry for Research and Innovation. LifeWatch ERIC Project EnBiC2-LabMCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 AETHER-UMA PID2020-112540RB-C41Ministerio de Universidades, Spain, European Union NextGenerationEU María Zambrano program 2021-23 Research fellow contractPlan Propio de la UMA, Junta de Andalucía, FEDER RNM262-G-FEDERUniversity of Málaga Ayudas para la Incorporación de Doctores del I Plan Propio de Investigación Call 2020. Postdoctoral research contractUniversity of Malaga B1.- Young researchers projects. II Plan Propio de investigación y transferencia 2022 Project B1-2022 09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife biologists increasingly use camera traps for monitoring animal populations. However, manually sifting through the collected images is expensive and time-consuming. Current deep learning studies for camera trap images do not adequately tackle real-world challenges such as imbalances between animal and empty images, distinguishing similar species, and the impact of backgrounds on species identification, limiting the models' applicability in new locations. Here, we present a novel two-stage deep learning framework. First, we train a global deep-learning model using all animal species in the dataset. Then, an agglomerative clustering algorithm groups animals based on their appearance. Subsequently, we train a specialized deep-learning expert model for each animal group to detect similar features. This approach leverages Transfer Learning from the MegaDetectorV5 (YOLOv5 version) model, already pre-trained on various animal species and ecosystems. Our two-stage deep learning pipeline uses the global model to redirect images to the appropriate expert models for final classification. We validated this strategy using 1.3 million images from 91 camera traps encompassing 24 mammal species and used 120,000 images for testing, achieving an F1-Score of 96.2% using expert models for final classification. This method surpasses existing deep learning models, demonstrating improved precision and effectiveness in automated wildlife detection.

Indexed as

Animals, WildDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsAnimalsAnimal identificationCamera trapsDeep learningYOLO

Identifiers

PMID40346172
PMCPMC12064792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.