ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based prediction of 90-day prognosis and in-hospital mortality in hemorrhagic stroke patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically interpretable prediction models of stroke functional outcomes: A national cohort study of adults in inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the US.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Optimizing stroke mortality prediction: a comparative study of sampling, cost-sensitive learning, and threshold adjustment.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor for: "Risk Factors for Early Poor Outcomes in in-Hospital Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study".Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Integrative Multidimensional Machine Learning Models for Stroke Prognosis: Age-Stratified and History Engineered Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on resting state scalp-recorded electroencephalogram-derived indices.PloS one · 2026Article
- AI-driven integration of imaging and radiology language improves stroke mortality prediction.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to predict hemorrhagic stroke outcomes, including 90-day prognosis and in-hospital mortality, using machine learning models and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. Data were collected from a national Stroke Registry from January 2014 to July 2022. Various predictive factors were considered, such as stroke severity at presentation, patient demographics, laboratory results, admission location, and other clinical features. Random forest, logistic regression, XGboost, support vector machines, and decision trees were trained and evaluated. SHAP analysis was conducted to identify key predictors. The RF model demonstrated superior performance in predicting prognosis, while LR was more effective in predicting in-hospital mortality. The National Institute of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) and admission location were key predictors. Despite its limitations, this research underscores the importance of advancing stroke registries and emphasizes the necessity for comprehensive external validation of predictive models. Furthermore, it demonstrates the importance of initial stroke severity in influencing patient outcomes and highlights the significance of admission to stroke units in reducing poor outcomes. This may help shape interventions to enhance stroke center capacities and influence strategic policies. This study contributes towards developing more precise predictive models for hemorrhagic stroke outcomes, potentially impacting clinical practice and optimizing resource allocation significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.