ArticleScientific reports2025
Micro hole drilling and multi criteria optimization of soda lime glass via ultrasonic assisted rotary electrochemical discharge drilling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regardless of the materials' intrinsic characteristics, electrochemical discharge drilling (ECDD) effectively micro-machines various materials. The present article optimizes the ultrasonic assisted rotary ECDD (UR-ECDD) process for maximizing the material removal rate (MRR), while minimizing the hole overcut (HOC) and circularity error (CE). The micro-holes are produced using a Taguchi's L16 array and multi-criteria optimization is carried out using grey relational based analysis (GRA). MRR, HOC and CE serve as a response parameter while tool vibration, tool feed rate, working material rotation, applied voltage and electrolyte concentration are control variables. UR-ECDD results in the improvement of 14.8% in MRR, 15.4% in HOC and 17.2% in CE when compared to the ECDD process. The optimized control variables based on GRA are derived as A4C3B4D1E4 (6 µm, 80 rpm, 0.9 mm/min, 35 V, 25 wt%). Tool vibration emerged as the most significant control variable. The GRG's predicted results at optimum conditions provide a satisfactory alignment with the experimental results. Machine learning-based algorithms are also used to predict the responses using Random Forest and Gradient Boost approaches. Comparative results indicated that the Random Forest predicts the responses with reduced error in comparison to the Gradient Boost method. The validation of the dataset exhibits a similar trend confirming the efficacy of prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.