Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346144›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of transfer learning methods and dataset characteristics on generalization in birdsong classification.

Burooj Ghani, Vincent J Kalkman, Bob Planqué, Willem-Pier Vellinga, Lisa Gill, Dan Stowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Burooj GhaniNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. burooj.ghani@naturalis.nl.
Vincent J KalkmanNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bob PlanquéXeno-Canto Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Willem-Pier VellingaXeno-Canto Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Lisa GillLandesbund fur Vogel- und Naturschutz, Hilpoltstein, Germany.
Dan StowellNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

GUARDEN 101060693MAMBO 101060639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal sounds can be recognised automatically by machine learning, and this has an important role to play in biodiversity monitoring. Yet despite increasingly impressive capabilities, bioacoustic species classifiers still exhibit imbalanced performance across species and habitats, especially in complex soundscapes. In this study, we explore the effectiveness of transfer learning in large-scale bird sound classification across various conditions, including single- and multi-label scenarios, and across different model architectures such as CNNs and Transformers. Our experiments demonstrate that both finetuning and knowledge distillation yield strong performance, with cross-distillation proving particularly effective in improving in-domain performance on Xeno-canto data. However, when generalizing to soundscapes, shallow finetuning exhibits superior performance compared to knowledge distillation, highlighting its robustness and constrained nature. Our study further investigates how to use multi-species labels, in cases where these are present but incomplete. We advocate for more comprehensive labeling practices within the animal sound community, including annotating background species and providing temporal details, to enhance the training of robust bird sound classifiers. These findings provide insights into the optimal reuse of pretrained models for advancing automatic bioacoustic recognition.

Indexed as

BirdsMachine LearningVocalization, AnimalAnimalsBioacousticsClassificationDeep learningFeature embeddingsKnowledge distillationPassive acoustic monitoringTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40346144
PMCPMC12064815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.