Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346142›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Reexamination of honey bee Africanization in Mexico and other regions of the New World.

Emeterio Payró de la Cruz, Martina Valencia Domínguez, Rodimiro Ramos Reyes, Adam Tofilski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emeterio Payró de la CruzTecnológico Nacional de México Campus Zona Olmeca, Ocuiltzapotlán, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9970-6561
Martina Valencia DomínguezTecnológico Nacional de México Campus Zona Olmeca, Ocuiltzapotlán, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0919-5063
Rodimiro Ramos ReyesEl Colegio de La Frontera Sur, Ranchería Guineo, Villahermosa, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3957-8160
Adam TofilskiUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland. rotofils@cyf-kr.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-7029

Funding

Narodowym Centrum Nauki 2021/41/B/NZ9/03153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are not native to the New World. The initial introduction of the species to the Americas occurred from Europe, with subsequent introductions from Africa. The African bees hybridized with European bees and are now referred to as Africanized bees. A large feral population was established and subsequently colonized extensive areas of both the North and South American continents, including Mexico. The aim of this study was to conduct a morphometric analysis of geographic variation among Africanized bees. Recently acquired data from Southeastern Mexico were compared with existing datasets of Africanized bees and evolutionary lineages from the Old World. The forewing venation was described using 19 landmarks. The honey bees originating from southeastern Mexico exhibited significant differences from all other investigated populations. It is necessary to verify if the observed geographic variation within Africanized bees is related to natural selection or other factors, including hybridization or genetic drift. Furthermore, honey bees from populations in the USA and Argentina, which appear to have not been affected by Africanization, differed markedly from honey bees naturally occurring in Europe and can be classified as hybrids between evolutionary lineages.

Indexed as

BeesAfricaAnimalsBiological EvolutionGeographyMexicoAfricanized honey beesApis melliferaMexicoVenationWing

Identifiers

PMID40346142
PMCPMC12064644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.