ArticleScientific reports2025
Mitigating class imbalance in churn prediction with ensemble methods and SMOTE.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Class Imbalance in Fetal Health Classification: Rigorous Benchmarking of Multi-Class Resampling Methods on Cardiotocography Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating Business Intelligence and CRM Systems With a Machine Learning Approach for Predictive Customer Retention in E-Commerce.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
- Augmenting small tabular health data for training prognostic ensemble machine learning models using generative models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- An improved SMOTE algorithm for enhanced imbalanced data classification by expanding sample generation space.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines how imbalanced datasets affect the accuracy of machine learning models, especially in predictive analytics applications such as churn prediction. When datasets are skewed towards the majority class, it can lead to biased model performance, reducing overall effectiveness. To analyze this impact, the research utilizes a churn dataset to evaluate how data imbalance influences model accuracy. The study utilized nine individual classifiers along with six homogeneous ensemble models to evaluate the effects of imbalanced data on model performance. Single classifier models struggle to identify underlying patterns in imbalanced data, while ensembles improve predictive performance by focusing on the minority class. However, when trained on unbalanced data, their accuracy remains subpar. The top six classifiers were selected for further investigation based on their performance on the imbalanced data. A SMOTE sampling technique was employed to create a balanced dataset, ensuring that all classes were adequately represented. The generated model's performance improved from 61 to 79%, indicating the removal of bias in the target data. The results showed that Adaboost, an optimal classifier, demonstrated superior performance with an F1-Score of 87.6% in identifying potential churn and assessing customer account health. The findings emphasize the importance of balanced datasets for accurate ML model predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.