Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346110›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mitigating class imbalance in churn prediction with ensemble methods and SMOTE.

R Suguna, J Suriya Prakash, H Aditya Pai, T R Mahesh, Venkatesan Vinoth Kumar, Temesgen Engida Yimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R SugunaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
J Suriya PrakashDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, JAIN (Deemed-to-be-University), Bangaluru, Karnataka, India.
H Aditya PaiDepartment of CSE, MIT School of Computing, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, Pune, 412201, India.
T R MaheshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, JAIN (Deemed-to-be-University), Bangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Venkatesan Vinoth KumarSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632001, India.
Temesgen Engida YimerDepartment of Mathematics, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia. Temesgen.engida@du.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines how imbalanced datasets affect the accuracy of machine learning models, especially in predictive analytics applications such as churn prediction. When datasets are skewed towards the majority class, it can lead to biased model performance, reducing overall effectiveness. To analyze this impact, the research utilizes a churn dataset to evaluate how data imbalance influences model accuracy. The study utilized nine individual classifiers along with six homogeneous ensemble models to evaluate the effects of imbalanced data on model performance. Single classifier models struggle to identify underlying patterns in imbalanced data, while ensembles improve predictive performance by focusing on the minority class. However, when trained on unbalanced data, their accuracy remains subpar. The top six classifiers were selected for further investigation based on their performance on the imbalanced data. A SMOTE sampling technique was employed to create a balanced dataset, ensuring that all classes were adequately represented. The generated model's performance improved from 61 to 79%, indicating the removal of bias in the target data. The results showed that Adaboost, an optimal classifier, demonstrated superior performance with an F1-Score of 87.6% in identifying potential churn and assessing customer account health. The findings emphasize the importance of balanced datasets for accurate ML model predictions.

Indexed as

Churn predictionEnsemble modelsImbalanced dataMachine learningPredictive analyticsSampling techniquesSingle classifier

Identifiers

PMID40346110
PMCPMC12064797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.