ArticleScientific reports2025
Different traits shape winners and losers in urban bird assemblages across seasons.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Avian neighbours: density patterns of synanthropic birds along a rural-urban landscape gradient in Northern India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Patterns of Avian Frugivory in Beijing's Urban Forest Across Multiple Temporal Scales.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Landscape and Season Influence Bat Activity and Richness in a Mediterranean Metropolitan Area.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urbanisation is a major driver of global biodiversity decline, profoundly affecting animal communities. While most studies on bird communities have primarily focused on the breeding season, we aimed to identify species responses and their associated traits by adopting a stratified design and using a multi-season approach considering a gradient from highly urbanised city centres to the urban-rural fringe across six Italian cities. We found that bird assemblages exhibited different responses to urbanisation according to season. Winners (i.e. species positively affected by urbanisation) were characterised by traits such as colonial nesting, high productivity and longevity. In winter, these species displayed generalist foraging strategies and solitary behaviour. Losers (i.e. species negatively affected by urbanisation) tended to be insectivorous, ground-nesting and short-distance migratory species. Interestingly, intra-specific variations emerged, with wintering populations of some species exploiting highly urbanised areas despite not breeding there. Urban adapters, although not strictly winners, displayed resilience by navigating a range of urban conditions, effectively exploiting intermediate levels of urbanisation. This study provides novel insights into the complex ecological dynamics occurring within the urban matrix in different seasons. Our findings emphasise the importance of adopting a multi-season approach in research and urban planning to better understand species responses and develop more effective, sustainable strategies for biodiversity conservation in urban environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.