Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346095›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Rumen fermentation profile and methane mitigation potential of mango and avocado byproducts as feed ingredients and supplements.

Hassan Jalal, Ekin Sucu, Damiano Cavallini, Melania Giammarco, Muhammad Zeeshan Akram, Büşra Karkar, Min Gao, Luigi Pompei, Jorge Eduardo, Paraskevi Prasinou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Fecal metabolome in Nelore bulls fed pre- and post-feedlot diets.Tropical animal health and production · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hassan JalalDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Ekin SucuFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Bursa Uludag University, 16059, Bursa, Türkiye.
Damiano CavalliniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. damiano.cavallini@unibo.it.
Melania GiammarcoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Muhammad Zeeshan AkramNutrition and Animal-Microbiota Ecosystems Laboratory, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
Büşra KarkarFaculty of Science and Arts, Department of Chemistry, Bursa Uludag University, 16059, Bursa, Türkiye.
Min GaoState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation & Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010021, China.
Luigi PompeiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Jorge EduardoFood Research Department, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autonoma de Coahuila, 25280, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico.
Paraskevi PrasinouDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Isa FusaroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Loc. Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca ECS00000041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fruit byproducts represent a sustainable alternative to conventional feed for ruminants, addressing food-feed competition and environmental concerns, particularly through their potential to reduce enteric methane emissions via bioactive compounds. This study explored the use of mango and avocado byproducts as feed ingredients and supplements. In experiment 1, mango peel (MP), mango seed kernel (MSK), mango seed coat (MSC), avocado peel (AP), and avocado seed (AS) were independently tested to determine their chemical composition, in vitro digestibility, and rumen fermentation parameters, including gas production and methane emissions. In experiment 2, rumen fermentation parameters were evaluated across five treatment groups: The control group received 200 mg of alfalfa hay alone, without any supplementation. The remaining four groups each received 200 mg of alfalfa hay as the basal diet, supplemented with 15 mg of one of the following microencapsulated extracts: mango peel extract (MPE), avocado peel extract (APE), mango seed kernel extract (MSKE), or avocado seed extract (ASE). Both experiments were conducted over three runs, with each run including three replicates per treatment group, resulting in a total of nine replicates per group. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models with Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05). MSK had the highest crude protein content, whereas AP had the highest ether content. MSC and AP presented the highest fiber fractions. AP and MP showed higher total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity. In experiment 1, AS, MP and MSK resulted in greater in vitro dry matter digestibility, and cumulative gas production compared to MSC and AP. Acetate to propionate ratios were higher in AS, MSC, and MSK. Methane production (ml/g dry matter incubated) was highest in MSK (43.7), while AP (19.8) and MSC (18.7) produced the lowest, representing almost 55% reduction compared to MSK (P < 0.001). MP (40.9) and AS (42.2) had intermediate methane values. Ammonia nitrogen was highest in AP and lowest in MSC. In experiment 2, MSKE, ASE and the control had the highest cumulative gas production, whereas APE reduced methane production by 16% compared to the control and lowered the acetate-to-propionate ratio. Compared with the control, all the encapsulated extracts lowered the ammonia nitrogen concentration. Overall, MP, MSK, and AS have emerged as the most promising ingredients because of their relatively high digestibility, and fermentation efficiency, whereas APE and MPE have potential as feed supplements for reducing in vitro methane production.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietary SupplementsFermentationMangiferaMethanePerseaRumenAnimalsFruitPlant ExtractsSeedsMethanePlant ExtractsDigestibilityEncapsulated extractsFruit byproductsMethanePhenolic compoundsRuminal fermentation

Identifiers

PMID40346095
PMCPMC12064803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.