Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346055›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Wearable continuous diffusion-based skin gas analysis.

David Clausen, Max Farley, Abigail Little, Kevin Kasper, Joseph Moreno, Larissa Limesand, Philipp Gutruf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David ClausenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3566-1859
Max FarleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Abigail LittleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Kevin KasperDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1242-831X
Joseph MorenoDepartment of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Larissa LimesandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Philipp GutrufDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. pgutruf@arizona.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophysical signals such as motion and optically acquired hemodynamics represent foundational sensing modalities for wearables. Expansion of this toolset is vital for the progression of digital medicine. Current efforts utilize biofluids such as sweat and interstitial fluid with primarily adhesively mounted sensors that are fundamentally limited by epidermal turnover. A class of potential biomarkers that is largely unexplored are gaseous emissions from the body. In this work, we introduce an approach to capture emission of gas from the skin with a leaky cavity designed to allow for diffusion-based ambient gas exchange with the environment. This approach, coupled with differential measurement of ambient and in-cavity gas concentrations, allows for the real-time analysis of sweat rate, VOCs, and CO

Indexed as

GasesSkinWearable Electronic DevicesBiosensing TechniquesCarbon DioxideDiffusionHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicSweatVolatile Organic CompoundsCarbon DioxideGasesVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID40346055
PMCPMC12064829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.