ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Assessment of urgent investigative images transfer effectiveness from trauma and orthopaedic to neurosurgery department: a quality improvement project.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurosurgical emergencies, including cauda equina syndrome, traumatic spinal cord injuries and traumatic brain injuries, require timely diagnosis and intervention to prevent severe morbidity and mortality. Delays in these cases often stem from inefficiencies in transferring investigational images from district hospitals to external neurosurgery units.
aimsThis quality improvement project aimed to reduce image transfer time at Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals Trust (SWBH) to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham neurosurgery unit. It sought to empower Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) doctors to independently transfer images using an image exchange portal (IEP) software, bypassing reliance on traditional picture archiving and communication teams.
methodsOver three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles (February and September 2024), T&O registrars and junior doctors were trained to use the IEP. Additional instructional resources were provided following low compliance. Image transfer times and neurosurgical response times were compared preintervention and postintervention.
resultsThe intervention reduced the average time from referral to image transfer from 18 hours to 3.6 hours across the cycles. The proportion of images transferred within 1 hour increased from 36% to 59%, and 87% of images were reviewed by neurosurgery within 6 hours by the final cycle. Operational cost savings were achieved by reducing reliance on IT services, radiographers and length of stay.
conclusionsThis project improved the timeliness of image transfer and neurosurgical care at SWBH. Although IEP software proved effective locally, its broader applicability across UK hospitals remains uncertain. The findings highlight the need for a national solution to streamline image transfers and further research to enhance technologies supporting rapid investigative imaging. Empowering front-line clinicians with appropriate tools provides a replicable model for addressing similar challenges in other institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.