ArticleBMJ open2025
Factors related to nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards pain management: a cross-sectional study of 32 tertiary hospitals in Anhui province, China.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influencing factors of pain management knowledge and attitudes among emergency nurses in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Acute Pediatric Pain Management Among Anesthesiologists, Pediatricians, and Pediatric Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRecognising and managing pain was considered an essential clinical skill for nurses. This study aimed to assess nurses' knowledge of pain management and the factors associated with it.
designA cross-sectional survey was conducted in Anhui province, China, using the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) (2014). Multiple linear regression analysis identified factors associated with nurses' KASRP Scores.
settingThe study was carried out in 32 tertiary hospitals in Anhui province, China, from 21 May to 13 July 2023.
participants6928 registered nurses. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the KASRP Score, reflecting nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards pain management. We assessed the associations between sociodemographic factors, knowledge-sharing behaviours (KSBs) and KASRP Scores.
resultsAmong the 6928 nurses analysed, the average KASRP Score was 17.70±3.57, corresponding to a correct response rate of 44.55%. Gender (p=0.003), professional title (p<0.001), education level (p<0.001), hospital grade (p=0.002), work department (p<0.001), pain resource nurse status (p<0.001), receipt of pain training (p<0.001), level of concern for patient pain (p<0.001), and KSBS Score (p<0.001) significantly influenced knowledge and attitudes. XGBoost regression further identified pain training, clinical department and KSB as top predictors, with relative importance weights of 0.237, 0.170 and 0.135, respectively (R² = 0.268, MSE=38.3).
conclusionsThis large-scale study revealed inadequate knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management among nurses in Anhui province, with outcome scores associated with various demographic and professional factors. These findings highlighted the need for continuous education, enhanced academic training and supportive institutional policies. Nursing leaders should implement targeted training initiatives and promote knowledge-sharing environments to strengthen pain management competencies among nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.