Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40345395›Full record

ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2025

Validation of an updated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for sacral tumors.

Jordan O Gasho, Joshua M Coan, Patrick J Boland, John H Healey, Jay S Wunder, Matthew T Houdek, Francis J Hornicek, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jordan O GashoKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: gasho@usc.edu.
Joshua M CoanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick J BolandDepartment of Surgery, Orthopedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
John H HealeyDepartment of Surgery, Orthopedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jay S WunderMusculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew T HoudekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Francis J HornicekDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Joseph H SchwabDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel G TobertDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background contextAssessing functional outcomes and quality of life is crucial in evaluating patient and disease management. Sacral tumors are rare and present with complex oncologic backgrounds and diverse symptoms, complicating the development of a clinically relevant and generalizable tool. A previous validation study refined an initial attempt to create a tool specific to sacral tumor patients. This study is the first independent validation of the revised shorter outcome tool. PURPOSE: To validate a revised patient-reported outcomes questionnaire specific to patients with sacral tumors. Secondarily, to assess the functional outcomes of patients with sacral tumors. STUDY DESIGN/

settingA survey study from a tertiary care multidisciplinary clinic was used for this study. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 70 patients with sacral tumors who presented to our institution between October 2017 and June 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: The following 8 questionnaires included in the revised sacral tumor survey were evaluated: the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health short form v1.1, PROMIS Pain Intensity 3a v1.0, PROMIS Gastrointestinal Bowel Incontinence 4a v1.0, PROMIS Gastrointestinal Constipation 9a v1.0, PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction v1.0 Male and Female, Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities v2.0.

methodsReliability, validity, and instrument coverage were evaluated by determining item completion rate, median score with interquartile range (IQR), and floor and ceiling effects. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Bias-corrected bootstrapping (1,000 resamples) was applied to calculate the standard error and 95% confidence intervals. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to assess the extent of questionnaire convergence and divergence.

resultsOur analysis demonstrates moderate to significant floor and ceiling effects among PROMIS Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale, PROMIS Sexual Function, and Urinary Distress Inventory (16%-61%) with predominantly more ceiling effects. Floor effects were notable for male interest (27%), female interest (29%), and female orgasm (38%). Moderate floor effects were noted for male satisfaction (11%), male orgasm (10%), and lubrication (14%). When controlling for patients with a colostomy, floor effects generally decreased, while ceiling effects showed variable changes. The revised questionnaire demonstrated strong internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values exceeding the threshold of 0.7 for all assessments except lubrication. GI bowel incontinence, male satisfaction, female satisfaction, and female interest were potentially redundant with a Cronbach's alpha above 0.9. In convergent validity, we found no significant trend in correlations between scores. Secondarily, when compared to patients with chronic diseases, our population reported similar levels of impaired physical health.

conclusionsSubstantial floor and ceiling effects, along with poor convergence, were observed for many of the bowel, bladder, and sexual function questionnaires. Some metrics improved when accounting for patients with colostomies; however, the significant floor and ceiling effects identified in the bowel, bladder, and sexual function surveys must be considered in future research using the modified sacral tumor survey. PROMIS instruments effectively capture the profound impact of sacral tumors and their treatment on patients' physical and mental well-being.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSacrumSpinal NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesSymptom AssessmentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSexual BehaviorFloor and ceilingPatient-reported outcomesPROMISQuality of lifeSacral tumorSurveyValidity

Identifiers

PMID40345395
PMCPMC13034578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.