ArticleImmunity2025
Computationally designed proteins mimic antibody immune evasion in viral evolution.
Article in Immunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioengineering strategies for improving the immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- From sites to structure to serology: a roadmap for structure-aware molecular evolution of antigenically evolving viruses.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- Addressing the zoonotic threat of merbecoviruses.Nature microbiology · 2026Review
- Algorithm-Optimized H5 Influenza mRNA Vaccine Induces Broad Immune Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- An integrated computational antigen discovery pipeline with hierarchical filtering for emerging viral variants.NAR molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Machine learning reveals hidden dimensions of functional similarity in proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for coordinating vaccine design, antiviral discovery, and real-world monitoring in the era of emerging and endemic viral threats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Constrained Evolutionary Funnels Shape Viral Immune Escape.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- TransFactor-prediction of pro-viral SARS-CoV-2 host factors using a protein language model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Antibodies for Infectious Diseases: Recent Past, Present, and Future.Biochemistry · 2025Review
- Without safeguards, AI-Biology integration risks accelerating future pandemics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recurrent waves of viral infection necessitate vaccines and therapeutics that remain effective against emerging viruses. Our ability to evaluate interventions is currently limited to assessments against past or circulating variants, which likely differ in their immune escape potential compared with future variants. To address this, we developed EVE-Vax, a computational method for designing antigens that foreshadow immune escape observed in future viral variants. We designed 83 SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins that transduced ACE2-positive cells and displayed neutralization resistance comparable to variants that emerged up to 12 months later in the COVID-19 pandemic. Designed spikes foretold antibody escape from B.1-BA.4/5 bivalent booster sera seen in later variants. The designed constructs also highlighted the increased neutralization breadth elicited by nanoparticle-based, compared with mRNA-based, boosters in non-human primates. Our approach offers targeted panels of synthetic proteins that map the immune landscape for early vaccine and therapeutic evaluation against future viral strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.