Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40345163›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2025

Soil Carbon Saturation: What Do We Really Know?

Katerina Georgiou, Denis Angers, Ryan E Champiny, M Francesca Cotrufo, Matthew E Craig, Sebastian Doetterl, A Stuart Grandy, Jocelyn M Lavallee, Yang Lin, Emanuele Lugato and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Storage Potential of Soil Functional Carbon Fractions in the World's Largest Plantations.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Katerina GeorgiouDepartment of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2819-3292
Denis AngersQuebec Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0473-527X
Ryan E ChampinyDepartment of Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0304-4845
M Francesca CotrufoDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6191-8953
Matthew E CraigEnvironmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8890-7920
Sebastian DoetterlDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0986-891X
A Stuart GrandyDepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
Jocelyn M LavalleeDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3028-7087
Yang LinDepartment of Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7923-0789
Emanuele LugatoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8947-352X
Christopher PoeplauThünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-8810
Katherine S RocciInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4235-6833
Steffen A SchweizerTUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-1005
Johan SixDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9336-4185
William R WiederInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7116-1985

Funding

Arcadia FundBayerisch-Kalifornischen Hochschulzentrum 8[2021-2]Department of Energy SCW1632King PhilanthropiesLawrence Livermore National Laboratory 22-ERD-021Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 24-SI-002National Science Foundation 2409246USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-67019-3139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing soils to increase organic carbon storage presents a potential opportunity to mitigate and adapt to global change challenges, while providing numerous co-benefits and ecosystem services. However, soils differ widely in their potential for carbon sequestration, and knowledge of biophysical limits to carbon accumulation may aid in informing priority regions. Consequently, there is great interest in assessing whether soils exhibit a maximum capacity for storing organic carbon, particularly within organo-mineral associations given the finite nature of reactive minerals in a soil. While the concept of soil carbon saturation has existed for over 25 years, recent studies have argued for and against its importance. Here, we summarize the conceptual understanding of soil carbon saturation at both micro- and macro-scales, define key terminology, and address common concerns and misconceptions. We review methods used to quantify soil carbon saturation, highlighting the theory and potential caveats of each approach. Critically, we explore the utility of the principles of soil carbon saturation for informing carbon accumulation, vulnerability to loss, and representations in process-based models. We highlight key knowledge gaps and propose next steps for furthering our mechanistic understanding of soil carbon saturation and its implications for soil management.

Indexed as

CarbonCarbon SequestrationSoilClimate ChangeEcosystemCarbonSoileffective capacitymineral‐associated organic carbonmineral capacityprocess‐based modelssequestration efficiencysoil carbon saturationsteady‐statevulnerability

Identifiers

PMID40345163
PMCPMC12062940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.