Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40344661›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Digital Mental Health Interventions for Young People Aged 16-25 Years: Scoping Review.

Courtney Potts, Carmen Kealy, Jamie M McNulty, Alba Madrid-Cagigal, Thomas Wilson, Maurice D Mulvenna, Siobhan O'Neill, Gary Donohoe, Margaret M Barry

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Courtney PottsSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-1611
Carmen KealyHealth Promotion Research Centre, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe - University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-6494
Jamie M McNultySchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9171-193X
Alba Madrid-CagigalSchool of Psychology, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe - University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4824-8307
Thomas WilsonSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4827-1750
Maurice D MulvennaSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1554-0785
Siobhan O'NeillSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8786-2118
Gary DonohoeSchool of Psychology, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe - University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-7426
Margaret M BarryHealth Promotion Research Centre, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe - University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9464-7176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital mental health interventions for young people offer a promising avenue for promoting mental well-being and addressing mental health issues in this population.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to explore the range of digital mental health interventions available for young people aged 16-25 years, with a particular focus on digital tool types, modalities, delivery formats, target populations, and study retention rates.

methodsThe scoping review was conducted in 6 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsychInfo). Studies were included if they were published from 2019 to 2024 in English, reported on a population of young people aged 16-25 years, and included validated mental health or well-being outcome measures. All types of digital interventions from promotion and prevention to treatment of mental health were included.

resultsAfter screening 13,306 articles, 145 articles were included in the final review. The findings reveal a diverse landscape of studies, equally focusing on the prevention and promotion of mental health and the treatment of mental ill health, most commonly using cognitive behavioral therapy (63/145, 43.4%). The most common digital tools were apps (51/135, 37.8%), web-based resources (45/135, 33.3%), and websites (19/135, 14.1%). The results highlight the over emphasis on convenience sampling (140/145, 96.6%), with participants mainly recruited from universities or colleges, and a lack of representation from marginalized groups, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth; those from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds; and those who are neurodivergent. Moreover, the focus on anxiety and depression leaves other mental health conditions underrepresented. Retention rates ranged from 16% to 100% and averaged 66% across all studies.

conclusionsThere is a need for more research on mental health promotion and prevention measures among those aged younger than 25 years as young people are at increased risk of mental health issues. This includes exploring different intervention approaches and modalities beyond cognitive behavioral therapy and ensuring inclusivity in study populations. Standardizing intervention durations and incorporating long-term follow-up data could provide valuable insights into the efficacy and effectiveness of digital interventions. Future studies should aim for greater inclusivity, ensuring representation from marginalized groups to address the diverse mental health needs of young people effectively. By adopting these approaches, digital mental health interventions can become more accessible, engaging, and impactful for young people worldwide.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthAdolescentAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansYoung Adultdigital interventiondigital mental healthmental health promotionmental health treatmentmHealthmobile healthPRISMAscoping reviewwell-beingyouth

Identifiers

PMID40344661
PMCPMC12102633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.