ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting breast cancer prognosis based on a novel pathomics model through CHEK1 expression analysis using machine learning algorithms.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCheckpoint kinase 1 (CHEK1) is often overexpressed in solid tumors. Nonetheless, the prognostic significance of CHEK1 in breast cancer (BrC) remains unclear. This study used pathomics leverages machine learning to predict BrC prognosis based on CHEK1 gene expression..
methodsInitially, hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained images obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) were segmented using Otsu's method. Further, the sub-image features were extracted using machine learning algorithms based on PyRadiomics, mRMRe, and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM). The predicted CHEK1 expression levels were represented as the pathomics score (PS) and validated using the corresponding RNA-seq data. The prognostic significance of both CHEK1 and PS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM), and univariate and multivariate Cox regression. The model was assessed by comparing CHEK1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with PS in BrC tissue microarray (TMA).
resultsA 633 × 10 sub-image set was eligible for training and a 158 × 10 set for validation. 1,488 features were extracted and 8 recursive feature elimination (RFE)-screened features were used to generate the model. A high PS was associated with CHEK1 overexpression, significantly correlating with survival outcomes, especially within 96 months post-diagnosis. Further, patients with high PS responded to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (anti-CTLA4) treatments. In TMA validation, the IHC analysis estimated that high PS similarly predicted poorer prognosis and correlated with higher CHEK1 expression.
conclusionsThe novel pathomics model reliably predicted CHEK1 expression using machine learning algorithms, which might provide potential clinical utility for prognosis and treatment guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.