ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Association of Baseline Serum Uric Acid With Venous Thromboembolism and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to analyze the association between baseline serum uric acid (SUA) level and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 626 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent/progressive NSCLC between September 2021 and August 2024. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff values for risk factors related to VTE, and clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected and compared according to these values. Fine-Gray regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of VTE, and survival was analyzed using log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.
resultsIn the study, 72 patients (11.50%) experienced VTE. Patients with VTE had a higher baseline SUA level than those without VTE (p = 0.000). The optimal threshold of baseline SUA to predict VTE was 310 μmol/L. The incidence of VTE was higher in the high SUA group than that of the low SUA group (19.1% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the baseline SUA level was associated with the risk of VTE (sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 2.830, 95% CI 1.689-4.742, p = 0.000). Additionally, the higher SUA level was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) in newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC staged I-IIIA (adjusted HR = 1.948, 95% CI 1.121-3.384, p = 0.018).
conclusionsAmong NSCLC patients, a baseline feature of high SUA (≥ 310 μmol/L) was associated with an increased risk of VTE and a worse clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.