Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40344446›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2025

Comparing intertemporal decision-making models: Predictions and applications in lifespan through subjective time perception.

Lijuan Dai, Ya Wang, Robin Chark, Lulu Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lijuan DaiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.
Ya WangSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Robin CharkCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Institute of Collaborative Innovation, University of Macau, Macao, China.
Lulu LiuDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-4110

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversidade de Macau
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intertemporal decision-making is essential in daily life, requiring individuals to evaluate the value of investments over time. This study aimed to assess how well intertemporal choice models explain and predict decision-making behaviours, focusing on subjective time perception across the lifespan. Five models were compared: two basic models (hyperbolic and exponential discounting) and three based on psychophysical principles of time perception (Stevens' power law exponential, Weber-Fechner exponential and Stevens' power law hyperbolic discounting). Using three datasets, this study identified which model better describes delay discounting and measured each model's predictive accuracy through cross-validation across the lifespan. Findings revealed that Stevens' power law exponential and hyperbolic discounting models provided better fit and predictive capability, suggesting that time perception in intertemporal decision-making follows Stevens' power law. The two models were applied to participants aged 9-82 years, showing nonlinear variations in discounting rates and time perception parameters. In summary, Stevens' power law exponential and hyperbolic models, which account for nonlinear subjective perceptions of time, enhanced understanding of intertemporal choice behaviours, attributing age-related differences in delay discounting to variations in time perception, thus supporting theories regarding age-related changes in delay discounting across the lifespan.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDelay DiscountingModels, PsychologicalTime PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult10‐fold cross‐validationage effectdelay discountingintertemporal choiceStevens' power lawWeber‐Fechner law

Identifiers

PMID40344446
PMCPMC12514332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.