ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Use of Model-Based Meta-Analysis to Inform the Design of Early Clinical Trials of Anti-Amyloid Beta Therapies in Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To inform an efficient development of new investigational anti-amyloid beta (anti-Aβ) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a modeling-and-simulation-based strategy was proposed. A general modeling framework that links drug exposures to the time course of amyloid plaque removal and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities characterized by edema and effusion (ARIA-E) was developed based on publicly available data on aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab. A non-linear mixed effect model with shared model parameters described the dose response data from aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab studies after adjusting for different potency for different antibodies, which allowed the rate of amyloid plaque removal to vary by drug. A time-to-event model was developed to describe ARIA-E incidence. The model assumes that ARIA-E incidence rate is dependent on the rate of amyloid plaque removal with a drug-dependent scaling factor linking amyloid plaque removal rate and treatment-dependent hazard. Simulations of amyloid plaque removal and ARIA-E for a hypothetical anti-Aβ mAb based on certain assumptions and scenarios provided insights into possible outcomes. Overall, the meta-analysis of published data on existing anti-Aβ mAbs could be utilized to model exposure-response relationships and the time course of amyloid plaque removal and ARIA-E incidence of new anti-Aβ mAbs and to inform the design of early clinical trials for them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.