ArticlePsycho-oncology2025
Co-Creating and Refining a Values Assessment Tool (VAsT) for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Who's gonna take care of my babies?" the impact of children on treatment decisions for women with metastatic breast cancer: a qualitative analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- "Insight into who you are as a human being": Perceptions of the Utility and Usability of a Values Assessment Tool (VAsT) for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPatients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and their families often have differing perspectives on treatment goals. This highlights the need for systematically eliciting patients' and care partners' values to ensure values-aligned treatment decisions. This study aimed to inform the development of a values assessment tool to facilitate communication of priorities and preferences with oncology clinicians.
methodsTwo rounds of semi-structured interviews were conducted with women with mBC from the Southeastern and Northeastern U.S. Recruitment included at least 50% of participants identifying as African American/Black, Latinx, Asian, American Indian, or Native American.
resultsThe initial round of 13 interviews yielded eight candidate domains. After confirmatory interviews with additional participants, the researchers identified nine final domains relevant to treatment decisions for mBC: desire not to appear sick; desire to help other women with breast cancer by participating in clinical research; financial concerns; living to care for a loved one; maintaining sexuality; maintaining quality of life; maximizing time away from medical appointments; minimizing and managing side effects; and slowing disease progression with an effective treatment.
conclusionEliciting treatment decision values across multiple domains and effectively communicating them with clinicians is a crucial aspect of patient-centered care to align values with care goals. To help patients identify and express their values to clinicians, we are developing a values assessment tool specifically for mBC. Future research will pilot this tool to assess its impact on communication between clinicians and patients and health outcomes for women with mBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.