ArticlePediatric pulmonology2025
The Association of Neonatal Respiratory Distress With Ciliary Ultrastructure and Genotype in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Primary ciliary dyskinesia phenotypes and correlation with genotype.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2025Review
- Noncoding DNA Variants in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Another Piece of the Diagnostic Puzzle.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of clinical and genetic features in an adolescent patient with primary ciliary dyskinesia induced by homozygous mutation in theFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the relationship between ciliary ultrastructure/genotype and prevalence of neonatal respiratory distress (NRD) in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). STUDY
designThis was a retrospective analysis from a multicenter, prospective study of children and adults with PCD. Participants were classified by ultrastructural defect associated with their diagnostic genetic variants: 1) outer dynein arm defect alone (ODA), 2) outer plus inner dynein arm defect (ODA/IDA), 3) inner dynein arm defect with microtubular disorganization (IDA/MTD), 4) DNAH11 (encodes ODA protein but has normal ultrastructure), and 5) normal/near-normal/other. The likelihood of NRD between ultrastructure groups or genotypes was evaluated by multivariate analysis using logistic regression, controlled for age, gender, race, and variant type. Similar analysis was performed within individual genotypes to assess association of NRD with the presence of 2 loss-of-function variants.
resultsOf the 455 participants analyzed, 305 (67.0%) reported NRD. The odds ratio for NRD in the DNAH11 group was significantly lower (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.76) compared to NRD in the ODA group. Within the DNAH5 group, those with two loss-of-function variants were more likely to have NRD compared to those with possible residual function variants (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.33-7).
conclusionNRD is less common in those with DNAH11 variants, thus a high index of suspicion should remain for PCD in the absence of NRD. Variant type (loss-of-function vs. residual function) may explain phenotypic variability within individual PCD genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.