Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40344282›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Context-dependent disturbance synergies: Subcortical competitors may constrain bark beetle outbreaks following wildfires.

Katherine A Mitchell, Lori D Daniels, Allan L Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Context-dependent disturbance synergies: Subcortical competitors may constrain bark beetle outbreaks following wildfires.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine A MitchellDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lori D DanielsDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Allan L CarrollDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-0759

Funding

B.C. Wildfire Service GR002195Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) RGPIN-2015-04376NSERC-Canada Wildfire Research Network GR018243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfires and bark beetles have historically interacted to create complex and resilient forests. However, recent record-breaking wildfires in western North America raise concerns that the large areas of injured and dead trees could facilitate increases in insect populations that respond to resource pulses. Populations of Douglas-fir beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae), the primary mortality agent of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), often irrupt following fires due to the resultant ephemeral pulses of defensively compromised hosts. Other subcortical phloeophagous insects are also attracted to fire (e.g., woodboring Coleoptera: Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) and similarly colonize damaged trees. Although Douglas-fir beetle and woodboring beetle species are known to colonize the phloem of injured trees, the potential for interactions among them following fire is relatively unknown. Rapid colonization by woodborers of the bark beetle niche following fires could constrain bark beetle population growth, potentially suppressing population irruptions through subcortical competition. To evaluate this hypothesis, we studied three wildfire complexes in mature Douglas-fir forests that burned in British Columbia in 2017. We found that Douglas-fir beetle preferentially colonized mature stands containing large-diameter trees with moderate fire injury and that these trees were frequently co-colonized by woodborers. In the absence of woodborers, we found that potential rates of increase in Douglas-fir beetle populations (i.e., offspring per female) were sufficient to lead to a local population irruption. Conversely, when woodborers were common (>50% of trees infested per stand), potential rates of increase in Douglas-fir beetle populations fell below replacement. These findings suggest that competition by woodboring beetles may suppress irruptions of Douglas-fir beetle in fire-injured forests. Our results reveal complex, context-dependent interactions among disturbance agents and indicate that population irruptions by resource pulse-driven bark beetles following fire may depend upon the response of local subcortical competitors. Forest management practices that enhance the diversity and abundance of non-irruptive phloeophagous insects such as many woodboring beetle species may limit the potential for wildfires to contribute to subsequent bark beetle outbreaks.

Indexed as

ColeopteraPseudotsugaWildfiresAnimalsBritish ColumbiaForestsPopulation Dynamicsbark beetlesBuprestidaeCerambycidaedisturbancedisturbance synergyDouglas‐fir beetleinterspecific competitionpopulation irruptionsScolytinaewildfire

Identifiers

PMID40344282
PMCPMC12061526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.