ArticleJournal of proteome research2025
To Fly, or Not to Fly, That Is the Question: A Deep Learning Model for Peptide Detectability Prediction in Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- PhosSight: A Unified Deep Learning Framework Boosting and Accelerating Phosphoproteome Identification to Enable Biological Discoveries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The GF-NEO discovery platform unveils a [KQE][DG] sequence motif within fusion neoantigens in pediatric cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Generation of peptide detectability datasets from single DIA experiment for prediction model fine-tuning.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- The State of Peptide Detectability in Computational Proteomics and Guidelines for AI Applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Based Bottom-Up Proteomics.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying detectable peptides, known as flyers, is key in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Peptide detectability is strongly related to peptide sequences and their resulting physicochemical properties. Moreover, the high variability in MS data challenges the development of a generic model for detectability prediction, underlining the need for customizable tools. We present Pfly, a deep learning model developed to predict peptide detectability based solely on peptide sequence. Pfly is a versatile and reliable state-of-the-art tool, offering high performance, accessibility, and easy customizability for end-users. This adaptability allows researchers to tailor Pfly to specific experimental conditions, improving accuracy and expanding applicability across various research fields. Pfly is an encoder-decoder with an attention mechanism, classifying peptides as flyers or non-flyers, and providing both binary and categorical probabilities for four distinct classes defined in this study. The model was initially trained on a synthetic peptide library and subsequently fine-tuned with a biological dataset to mitigate bias toward synthesizability, improving predictive capacity and outperforming state-of-the-art predictors in benchmark comparisons across different human and cross-species datasets. The study further investigates the influence of protein abundance and rescoring, illustrating the negative impact on peptide identification due to misclassification. Pfly has been integrated into the DLOmix framework and is accessible on GitHub at https://github.com/wilhelm-lab/dlomix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.