ArticlePloS one2025
Semen collection, semen analysis and artificial insemination in the kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) to support its conservation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The critically endangered kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) has suffered population declines due to habitat loss, hunting, and predation. Conservation efforts, including translocation to predator-free islands, have helped increase numbers of this flightless parrot from 51 individuals in 1995-142 in 2019. However, low fertility and high embryo mortality, likely due to genetic bottlenecks continue to hinder population growth. This is further aggravated by the kākāpō's lek mating system, which allows only a minority of males to father a disproportionate number of offspring, resulting in 21% of non-reproductive males. The study aimed to enhance assisted reproduction techniques to assess male fertility, increase egg fertility, and ensure genetic diversity. Artificial insemination (AI) was used to mimic a second copulation, as females mating with multiple males show higher fertility rates. During the 2019 breeding season, semen collection was successful in 20 males and in 93.5% of 46 attempts using abdominal massage method and electric stimulation technique. Semen volume, colour, consistency, contamination, pH and the motility, concentration, viability and morphology of spermatozoa were analysed. Ejaculate volume ranged between 0.1 and 210 µl and the mean pH was 7.5 ± 0.4 ([Formula: see text] ± SD). Average sperm viability was 87.4 ± 10.0% with a total motility of 60.9 ± 22.0% and a progressive motility of 28.3 ± 19.8%. AI was performed 15 times in 12 females, improving second clutch fertility (70% vs. 29.4% without AI). Egg fertility in the second clutch without AI was 29.41% (5/17) compared to 70% (14/20) after AI. Paternity testing confirmed AI offspring (four chicks of three females), including from two previously non-reproductive males, enriching the gene pool with rare alleles (e.g., genes from Fiordland founding population). This study demonstrates the value of assisted reproduction in conserving endangered avian species by improving reproductive success and preserving genetic diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.